Downvoting for now. "Should's" aren't the price. Give it a couple days and i'm sure i'll green it

agreed. Downvoting because this speculating is NOT what people are paying for it today.

Agreed with the two above. If prices were based on what an item "should" do then why not just make it .33 because, chances are, that's where the item "should" be priced at in the near future.

I agree with the above 3 comments so I'm downvoting. Price changes are for CURRENT pricing and not FUTURE pricing.

I am upvoting because no one will buy it for a high price now its in the new crate

Current price indicates future price expectation.

I still charge 2 ref. Greater availability does not constitute a lower price. If people demand this enough and like it a lot, the price should not fall or suffer. This is a good strange weapon and should hold its value as so.

I suppose it will drop but we set new prices AFTER the actual prices change, not BEFORE.

While the submission description is an awful reason for it, we have a case of a broken clock being right on our hands.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/4140379

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/4143484

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/4146545

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/4144995

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/4145154

5 trades selling a strange flamethrower for 1 refined or less over the past hour alone. I'll have to agree.

Upvoted thanks to vincent.