- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
I would actually just put this at 1.6, Those links aren't selling at 2 ref.
I thought I would put in a bit of a range. If I just put 1.66 people would think I was rep hogging which I'm not.
[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/5044337[/url]
[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/5028126[/url]
[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/5043148[/url]
[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/4983345[/url]
[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/5027997[/url]
[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/5014596[/url]
[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/4568043[/url]
[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/4893544[/url]
just seems like having the highend of 2 ref is wrong when there's so many masks sitting at 1.6 (and two of those links are less than 1.6)
There's 4 pages of this on tf2op alone and I just posted almost a page full of 1.6 b/o's.
Also forgot to mention that those are just listed prices, there's some up for no b/o which would probably go for 1.6 as well. Given that, I saw someone offer a key "1 day ago" when I was looking through trades. However I think these links are sufficient enough to list this as 1.66 flat.
Closing this after reviewing evidence presented by ruthvenmoon.