- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
More Unsold Rust Botkiller Flamethrowers @ 2 Ref:
[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/6262243[/url]
[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/6219374[/url]
[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/5990387[/url]
[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/5946486[/url] (Only one sold @ 2 Ref)
my concern is why would you want 'to try for 1.33 ref' ... that indicates (to me) that you are just trying to push the price down. although the market is clearly saturated with botkillers in general, im afraid im staying neutral as i cannot agree to someone looking to push the price down to the lowest point, not just taking the market price at its value.
I understand your point, but realize that the price range I suggested reflects the proof given. Plenty of unsold botkillers at 2 ref and therefore the range should not be 2.33 ref. There are also people willing to sell for 1.66 ref and that is why I kept that price. The reason I say I cannot support 1.33 ref is because there are mass buyers of botkillers on outpost who buy them for 1 ref or 1.33 ref. Some of them have rust botkiller flame throwers in their backpacks, but no one specifically commented "I'll sell my rust bk flame." Without that exact proof I would not be able to bring the price down further. I realize that may have confused you, and I hope this explanation helps.
ok i hear what you are saying. my point is, why are you trying to bring the price down 'further'? if you were looking to update a price based upon the market then that would be different, but to me, you appear to be trying to just pull down the price as much as you can, not attempting to reflect the market. again, i personally am staying neutral.
I hear what you are saying, but what I am doing is reflecting market price. I did not suggest 1.33 ref, I suggested 1.66-2 ref. True, I went in with the mindset of pricing it lower, but I did not. I have suggested enough prices to know and go with current market price, and not my personal biases. Again, I suggested 1.66-2 ref because there are plenty unsold at 2 ref and Links 1 and 2 are selling for 1.66 ref. I am representing the market value correctly.