- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
1 ref is already in the current range, and it's still no problem to sell them for .66.
It's just a small price bump.
It's not a price bump at all, it's needlessly removing a part of the price range that is perfectly acceptable.
One could argue that the price of the salvaged stranges are a little inflated in vintage form. So I'm ok with this being a solid ref (same for kritz, ullapool is 4 keys, etc).
So what do you want me to change it to 1.33 or something? It's not allowed to make the price a solid 1 ref anymore? I am raising the price, by one scrap. It was .88 ref, now it is 1 ref. I doubt the tf2 economy is going to be hugely impacted because vintage huntsmans went up 1 scrap, because people are selling/buying at 1 ref.
Sold one for 1 ref=all should be that high. Yeahh.... no.
Downvote. "Small price bump" because you feel like it isn't a valid reason.
I don't "feel like it" I sold one for a refined, take it or leave it I'm just showing I sold it for 1 ref, no need to take what i said and twist it.
I got one yesterday for a rec....so I'll submit a price for these for 0.33.....wait, no I wont.
It's in the range bro.
While your proof is meh. I've sold a lot of these at 1 ref pretty instantly >>
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/6294494
I've even had buyers of other vints offer 1 ref for it. While that isn't proof its still what I know to be true. BUT this probably shouldn't be a concrete 1 ref.
No.
Please, check the CURRENT price before suggesting a price. You sold it for a ref, the price is 0.66-1, What needs to be changed?