Suggestion: Eerie Orbiting Fire Magistrate's Mullet at 47.32–66.25 keys

Price Suggestion

~58 keys

eerie

24 votes up

13 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Thu, 22 Nov 12 03:39:25 +0000 by A Distinctive Lack of Vincent.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Any proof?

None for sale.

not really sure if i should upvote based on speculation

I'm doing a search for any past sells.

If I don't find any going for right price then I'll downvote.

alright let me know what you find and ill vote accordingly

Only proof I can offer is http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/5637194. Had it up for sale for a little while before trading some of my hats, and recieved an offer of a stormy guad (ehh) and an offer of $120.

Not sure how valid that $120 offer is (scammer?) but what did you end up selling the hat for?

I still have the hat, since no one offered 4 on it. Realistically it's worth 3, but I was only gonna sell it if I could profit, so I ended up keeping it.

how did you end up with the number 3?

He probably bought it for around 3 buds because he is not the originally owner of the hat if you look the trade history of the item.

Making a fresh comment to clean things up

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/5028990

Looks like the suggester indeed purchased for 3 buds worth.

Older trades:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/3676327

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/2230246

Was getting offers very solidly up to 2.5 here.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/4961597

Had a buyout of 2

Last halloween brought about another eerie fire mullet, but if it's being traded around, I have no idea where.

If I'm going to get picky, the 3.5 high point might be too high. It had a buyout of 2 not particularly long ago. 3.5 has it competing with the burning mullet at that point, and I'd like to see something solid if we're hitting that. That said... the 2.5-3 range can't be denied, it's what it sold for the last two trades. There's nothing completely concrete that says 3.5 is out of the realm of possibility, so while I'm not personally crazy about it, it's most certainly not enough to entirely void the suggestion.

Any further thoughts?