- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
http://backpack.tf/vote/id/50c3fc76ba25369544000000
I'm not sure what that link means. That's the buyer. So I'm only asking to raise the price to what is was bought at, 2.5. So the range could essentially be raised even higher so that the most current price is mid range, maybe 2.2-2.75... but people are asking only 3-3.5 for green energy, so I really don't think 3 is appropriate at this time
just pointing out that theres another suggestion going on at the same moment for anyone who was voting here, to make sure people would only vote for one or the other.
Well I was the seller and he's the buyer, so taking into account motive here, I have none- just reporting actual sales, not speculation.
I would definitely trust this over the other suggestion, but really, its an insignificant change.
We're not here to judge significance- .1 is .1, it matters to somebody and if it happened then it should be accounted for. What's the point in this site if not to show the most accurate price? And when does a price ever change much more than this? It's not like it will go from 2 to 6 buds..so just accept real prices as they happen...
http://backpack.tf/vote/id/50933b92ba2536204f000001
Admin disagrees.
Well then the admin can vote like the rest of the community.
Why even have this feature to suggest prices then? What unusuals under 10 buds even have that significant of a change? This sale was actually above the price range. It's not like it sold for 2.2, and I'm requesting 2.2-2.4...It sold for 2.5 so it should raise- period.
Might as well document every sale. I mean when you're talking about 1, 5, 10, 20 unusuals in existence- every sale matters.
"I mean when you're talking about 1, 5, 10, 20 unusuals in existence"
--which is why unusuals really shouldn't be listed on any price guide, as its quite hard to get an accurate price, and most traders (newer ones anyway) view spreadsheet prices as FIRM, and then never budge.
Also, in response to Doller, that suggestion was a little different--that suggestion only affected the bottom number and made the range smaller (something the admins arent really fond of).
which is why unusuals really shouldn't be listed on any price guide,
Well, it's here. So we can either have it exist and be inaccurate, or have it exist and represent recent sales of unusuals. I'm only 1 vote, so it's not up to me.
It's also half voters. When things are on the fence like that one, it's time for a glance at the rep weightings and a judgement call.
In this case, voters want this one heavily. I really would recommend not suggesting 0.1 changes like this though. Price changes on buds or things like the recent refined metal price change jerk unusual values around too much for things like this to have any lasting impact.