Suggestion: Cauldron Bubbles Exquisite Rack at 52.9–66.22 keys

Price Suggestion

~1150 keys

cauldron

30 votes up

21 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Fri, 28 Dec 12 05:19:46 +0000 by A Distinctive Lack of Vincent.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

It's worth noting that the second link has a C/O of Ghosts Dapper + Buds which has B/Os of 3.5 all over the place

To big raise with only 2 links although not much are sold..

I don't think it's too big a raise when one has sold for 3 pure very recently

NO U OWN ONE U RAISE PRICES U ARE CHEETER ! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oBy2nbYxSnI

xD jk good proof upvote

Ha, I'm kind of worried about it looking fishy since I do own one, but I'm glad you agree

It does look like it might be in need of a price bump, but there's no sign of anyone offering that ghost dapper. Plus 1 person buying it at 3 buds can just be luck on the sellers end.

I do agree with the fact that there is no evidence of the Dapper, but I didn't have much else to work with considering there are only 2 trades on outpost, and one passed for 3

Downvote. Too much of a raise on 1 trade :/

The last price for this hat was set 5 months ago with no proof or reasoning. I think my suggestion is perfectly valid.

Yes, but you are basing the whole price on 1 trade it could have just been the seller getting lucky and the buyer being desperate. I would upvote if at least 2 people got it sold in your price range.

So what you're telling me is that you would rather a 5 month old suggestion with no proof over an hour old suggestion with 2 links? Ok then.

Well now that the other guy sold his for 3 buds too, am happy. Upvote. There. And maybe the last suggestion was just accepted without proof because the price was so obvious or something.

am I the only one wondering why there's so many people with [Gent] tags nowadays?

No, there are tons of arbitrarily set prices on lots of unusuals

And let's not forget certain vintages like vintage metal, vintage gibus, vintage class tokens, etc.

5 months ago everything was different.~

Other times, you couldn't compare them to now.

sold mine some weeks ago for 3 too. upvote

You mine posting a screenshot of that trade?

I honestly think 3.3 is a little high considering exax sold one for 3, and some guy (who posted here--koka_love) also sold it for 3. So i think the high end should be 3, rather than 3.3

3.3 is taking into consideration overpay in unusuals. Plus, ranges are always nicer than one set price

prices here are based on pure offers, not unusuals.

Most prices here aren't based on shit and are out of date. Anyways, where do you see in the rules that prices for unusuals are pure, not overpay?

look at most other unusual suggestions that got accepted, you'll see that if the highest offer was 4 in unusuals (and it was sold for that) then the high end would be set around 3.6

I think your upper limit should be 3 considering that is the highest it has been proven to sell for. Lower your range to something like 2.4-3 and I will upvote, sorry.

Really? You really think .3 is a bigger issue than a buds' inaccuracy?

I think that having an accurate price is important. I would like to see the price get corrected, not changed to some other wrong price, that's all.

Last one was based on nothing, this one's based on a recent, solid trade. Makes sense to center around it until further trades are established.