Price Suggestion
~16.77 ref
Strange Flame Thrower
163 votes up
122 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed by Puddilicious.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Stockbuyers/quickbuyers are not good proof about prices. Better look at offers on selling trades.

    I agree with Farciarz. Those trades were all quicksell prices. It would be better to find people who are selling, not buying.

      Hard to find any finished sales. Some selling for 0.44 or 0.55, most trades are at 1rec.

      No reason for me to devaluate this once more as #47 finally stopped dropping.


      sold for 0.66

      http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/6914132 (older, but within the last change)

      sold for 0.55

      http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/6914132 (2 weeks)

      sold for 0.33

      http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/7089987

        These are getting pretty cheap. I have seen a ton of people on trade servers selling them for either a scrap or two scraps. Sometimes a reclaimed if you're unlucky XD

          Quickbuyers don't count. Plus with the crate containing this not dropping, it probably won't go down anymore.

            Quick sells don't count. Downvote

              .11 is way too low. There are people just starting out as traders buying for .33. i sold three in the past week for .33-.55 ref. i think it should remain over a scrap, since people do buy for more than that, especially on trade servers.

                i dont think backpack is quicksell price guide. and flamethrower is third best primary for pyro (after degreaser with 100percent pyros me included and festive that i like more because it costs more and looks better). you know what is 1 scrap? equalizer or normal wep. downvote from me

                  outpost down again

                    I don't think any stranges except the equalizer should go for 1 scrap. 2 should be minimum, and I've had no problem selling these at 2 scrap.

                      One sold a week ago doesn't really prove much. Five bought in three weeks is also pretty inconclusive on such a high volume item. Third link, same story as the first.


                      I'm closing this due to lack of evidence in favor of the price.