- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
Proof of this statement?
I but two fast learner dirty at 2.66 (quick sell i think) 1 week ago... now , im trying to sell it at 4 ref.... http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/7670337 , 6 day without comments or anything else ¬¬
[url="http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/7136277"]This guy didn't seem to have a problem selling at 4 ref.[/url]
Although, the trade has been up for 3 weeks.
I hate people's "if it doesn't have evidence it wrong downfote fuck you" attitude. the admins who choose if a suggestion is taken into action or not actually look into the prices and collect their own evidence, and if a price suggestion is accurate enough and has at least some reason then it does not matter if there's loads of links or not.
Love how you assumed I was saying "this suggestion is terrible and shouldn't pass because no proof."
I was asking if the suggester had proof, but thanks for jumping to conclusions.
will wait for more proof
I offered 3.66 today, rejected.
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/7725543 - sold for 2 keys
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/7136277 - sold for 4ref
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/7579499 - sold for 1 key
thats were just 4 pages. one got lucky. The most unsold are painted, so not relevant.
1 key = 3.33 ... sold for 3.33 ref - 4 ref... (?) , is the price i suggested.. u can read?
"one got lucky" i wrote and i posted it for the sake of completeness, i think the reading issue beolongs to you. 2keys, 4ref - impossible??? Hello? Anybody home?
edit: prooving your price is your work, and i never saw 3ref