Suggestion: Dr's Dapper Topper at 1.33–1.44 ref

Price Suggestion

~1.66 ref

47 votes up

8 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Fri, 18 Jan 13 07:05:19 +0000 by [GIRL] Mr. Bucket.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/7967737/done (My own trade, bought one for 1.33 within 14 minutes)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/7787144 (Bought for 1.33. Look in comments)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/7967843 (Sold for 1.33)

http://www.tf2tp.com/trade.php?trade=9016176 (Sold for 1.44)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/7832944 (Sold for 1.44)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/7962106 (Selling for 1.44)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/7842328 (Failing to sell for 1.66)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/7876715 (Failing to sell for 1.66)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/7952871 (Failing to sell for 1.55)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/7964875 (Failing to sell for 1.55)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/7951606 (Failing to sell for 1.66)

http://bazaar.tf/trade/110220 (Failing to sell for 1.66)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/7691520 (Invalid proof, had offer of 1.66)

Sorry for the small amount of proof, most of these hats that are for sale are often collector's levels or painted. More proof will be posted here or in other comments when found.

The last link has an offer of 1.66 ref in the comments, but other than that your proof is decent.

Whoops, missed that. Thanks!

Overall, your proof is solid, but I've got a few issues with some of your links.

e.g. Your 4th "Failing to sell" link has only been up for 3 hours. That's honestly not failing to sell. The 3rd fail link, too, is only 21 hours old.

I'm still upvoting, but try not include flawed evidence in the future.

Ah, sorry this is my first suggestion. I'll make sure to look at the times the trades have been up in the future.

Haha, no worries. I did abysmally with my first suggestion a few days ago. Right now I'm trying to pick up some of the qualities of good suggestions, and pass on some constructive criticism :D

Seems good.