Suggestion: The Frying Pan at 0.33 ref

Price Suggestion

~2.72 ref

76 votes up

74 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed Sun, 03 Feb 13 20:31:59 +0000 by Puddilicious.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

This will easily go for .33 I even had to pay .33 for mine I was disappointed when I came to backpack saw its worth .22 and there was basically no one selling for that price! HERE IS YOUR PROOF YOU PROOFAHOLICS

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/6816303

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8115901

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/7159815

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8192797

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8272858

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/7587289

There are TONS unsold at .33. Re-suggest at .22-.33.

Tell me where, I'll buy em all.

Outpost. Just go look. Hundreds there.

Aren't there some people collecting pans just to brag? lol

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/6809361 bought 13 for 1 scrap

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8349957 at least 4 adds in 1 day for 2 scrap

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8240847 bought 3 for 1 scrap

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8263328 bought 2 for 1 scrap

-> if anything the range should be extended to 0.11-0.22, 0.33 flat is definitely wrong

The range should be 0.11-0.33, thats why it is 0.22 flat if I remeber right.^^

I'm fairly sure they are so easy to buy for a scrap because a lot of newbs think these are just like any other weapon, and will then gladly sell them for a scrap because they're glad that someone wants a pan in the first place.

That should make price 0.11-0.33, not 0.22. Taking the average of the range like that doesn't really make sense to me, it's selling both the buying and selling sides short. Or if we're looking only at what people are selling them for in selling trades (instead of what active buyers are getting them for), suggest a range 0.22-0.33 like it used to be. 0.11-0.22 is incorrect in my opinion because suggester proves these still easily sell for a rec, therefore that should be included in the range.

I meant to write 0.11-0.33 sorry

Yeah, no. The reason .22 was accepted in the first place (which was my suggestion by the by) was because .22 is the average. Most trades happen at .22 with some at .11 and .33. You have to prove that .22 is impossible.

As I said in another comment on this suggestion, "[M]ake [the] price 0.11-0.33, not 0.22. Taking the average of the range like that doesn't really make sense to me, it's selling both the buying and selling sides short. Or if we're looking only at what people are selling them for in selling trades (instead of what active buyers are getting them for), suggest a range 0.22-0.33 like it used to be."

If you look at the suggesters comment, you will see a lot of pans still sell at 0.33. Jerrinho proved that on the other hand, a lot are still being bought at 0.11. Since both these prices are so common, it doesn't make sense to just set it to 0.22 - there should be a range to accurately reflect the market.

Yes. I read your comment. No need to post it twice.

Now, if the vast majority of pans are being sold at .33, then by all means, make it a range of .22-.33. I don't think .33 is correct however. That's all I meant to say with my comment.

then should i close the trade?

I don't think 0.33 will get accepted. You can close this, then open a suggestion (what you call trade) for 0.11-0.33, with your proof to justify the 0.33 high end and Jerrinho's proof from his comment to justify the low end of 0.11. That way everybody will be happy :P

I didn't post it twice, I quoted it because I wasn't sure you read any of the submission comments - the amount of pans sold at 0.33 and bought at 0.11 is more than I would consider 'some', if you look at the links in this suggestion. Just clarifying.

I'm still supporting a range of 0.11-0.33, then everybody will be happy (hopefully).

i melted that crap

I like that dislike you got.^^

when u play MvM and just hear "boing boing" the whole time...

Actually you can't craft them, right? Now I'm not sure about this anymore. xD