- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
A mark.II shouldn't be worth more than a mark.II
The hype has gone down. Now it's just two different varieties, depends on which you like best, the heavy or engy head. No reason why one should be more/less than the other without proof that they are
A mark.II shouldn't be worth more than a mark.II
lolololol
lolwut,,,,?
[img]http://pl.memgenerator.pl/mem-image/next-time-put-some-proof-pl-ffffff[/img]
Probably, but you should still show us proof... This is a weird range. Can you show people buying at 1.77 and selling successfully at 2 ref, and failing to sell above that?
what do you mean probably? re-read the original post. He's saying a mark.II shouldn't be worth more than a mark.II xD
I read through the typo and assumed he means Mark II shouldn't be worth more than Mark I.
"assuming" ;) i prefer not to assume things ;3
Whenever you assume you make an ass of you and me
No he ment Mark I shoudn't be more than a Mark II you're writing it the wrong way
Yeah, my bad.
No.
"A mark.II shouldn't be worth more than a mark.ll" < They are the same thing?
I would agree IF you had proof, if you don't have proof we can;t vote yes.
"A mark.II shouldn't be worth more than a mark.II"
That was so retarded on so many levels.
"A mark.II shouldn't be worth more than a mark.II"
EpicManofAwesomeness has just spoken the words of a generation.
n00b
Actually, mk II should be lower than mk I.
ded
dat proof o3o
free rep :)
Are you retarded?