Price Suggestion
~180 keys
g.nrg
Unusual Backwards Ballcap Green Energy
6 votes up
25 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted by A Distinctive Lack of Vincent.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

we all know this is retardedly wrong. and the p energy price is too. these are both 1 of 1 and id set it higher but ppl always bitch at me... so, my "proof" is kaos from the tf2-t server unboxed THE ONLY ONE andsold NO problem for 8 pure. i realize there is alot of hype since its the 1st one but 7 buds pure is a very fair estimate.

FEEL FREE TO DISAGREE BUT DO PROVIDE REASONING. THANK U. IM SRY IF MANY PEOPLE THINK THIS IS WRONG AS IM NOT AN EXPERT TRADER. I BASE THIS OFF MY EXPERIENCES AND MY LOGIC. THANK U

    do you have any evidence of it? like pictures?

      if you get a pic of that trade, then this might pass.

        unfortunately im not kaos. but feel free to ask him and the other person. im not SUPER DEDICATED to make the change but the price is sooo stupidly low....

      http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8355171


      To help you out. One fellow who was gathering 4 max heads, another guy came along to offer 8, no gathering required, and got it.

        thank u sir. very well appreciated

          Looks good.^^

        you call this price wrong, than continue to try and give reason without any links to the "proof"

          well its one of one and u can ask kaos and the owner of the hat

            Proof is above.

            Current price is completely off, I don't think anyone's going to disagree with that. Unfortunately, with just 1 recorded and nothing on Outpost, pinning down a value is going to be impossible.


            Not sure how/why this ended up being set at 3 buds o.O

              Estimates on tf2pricecheck were around 5 buds at around the time this was entered into the site. I wouldn't be surprised if it was put in at about that, maybe a bit lower, then got knocked down to what it is now from the key/bud price changes.

              It was heavily downvoted as proof wasn't initially provided. With a bit of searching though, the suggester was indeed correct, as shown above. Accepting.