Well, the two links show next to zero interest besides a lower unusual offer, and that was over a month ago. Can you think of any reason this should be much higher than logo when they are normally coupled together?

I know, and I was just telling you why I think you may be wrong.

Therefore the single offer in the past month must be the sole piece of sale evidence, which is a 1.2 unusual, so factor in unusual overpay as usual. Also supportive of this new price is general lack of interest in it, no other offers, none in pure. So with a distinct lack in evidence we must look to some other factor to help decide a price. It's twin unusual, tf logo, which in general is considered slightly more popular due to its relevance sets a lower bench mark. A saving grace would be a possible theme, but there is no theme I can see. Couple that with the fact that one just went back up for 1.5 B/O instantly suggests this should be lower than the current top price, and rarely do low end unusuals reach their B/O unless quick selling.

So altogether we have an unusual that has 1: Little to no interest. 2: Closest to being relevant offer is a 1.2 unusual. 3: It's slightly favored twin is p/ced lower, despite no real factor to suggest it should be and 4: Just reopened a trade with a lowered B/O after a extended period of zero offers. All this combined points to a considerable price drop.