- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
this suggest is a Counter-proof the other suggest http://backpack.tf/vote/id/511f4477ba2536e147000001 + correcting the price.
1- there is no one have b/o of 1.1 to set price 1.1
2- been offered 1.1 , doesn't mean i have to take it as price.
3- 1-1.1 buyer trade not suppose to use as proof
there are many offers of 1.3 and some of them rejected :
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8460417 offered 1.3 , didn't take it
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8481973 reject 1.15 , reject 1 pure + .3 in items
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/7891993 ignoing peoples saying 1.3-1.5 he want 5 buds lol
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8567411 27 keys + ts bill , 1.3
1.6 seems high and 1.1 low , peoples offering 1.3 in pure just in the past hours/days
so i'm suggesting 1.3 flat to be the correcting price.
and this advice is free :
http://www.tf2wh.com/overstock.php you can sell two fire diary's NOW there not full stock , you'll get back 39 keys each
hurry :P
i saw a guy selling one for a bud and a bills, had no takes
Both of your proofs and reasoning are good, and they both have good upvotes but personally, I prefer giving a range vs a flat value.