- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
No one is buying or selling this for less than 2ref.
wow, you're so good at making suggestions
Why dont you buy the hat from me for 2.66-3ref and prove me wrong?
>Tries to manipulate price in his favor
>Is actually lowering it
I am not trying to manipulate the price. I am trying to sell this hat and no one is buying it so im trying to get a price set so someone will buy it.
price is already above 2 ref -____________________-
If anyone wants to prove me wrong. Then buy this hat from me for 2.66-3ref
If you're trying to set a price, find proof to back it up. It's hard to believe you without any proof from any trading sites.
Okay, I'm going to tell you how to make your suggestion better.
1.) NEVER, and I mean NEVER, use "If the old/new price is accurate, sell me yours/buy mine" as a reason. It isn't a valid argument because the person may not want to trade for the item in question regardless of your suggestion.
2.) Search links are not proof.
3.) Don't tell us to find our own proof, it is your responsibility as the creator of a suggestion to provide proof.
4.) Quickbuyers aren't proof either. They attempt to buy items for much lower than current value, often with no success.
5.) Look for proof from sellers too. Find unsold hats priced at 3/2.66 ref that have been unsold for over a week with no interest, and show buyers successful at 2.33/2 ref.
The thing is that the only people buying are quickbuyers. The person I found is trolling and just has the trade open for no reason. Any person trying to sell the carl is trying to sell it for 3ref or a key and they have not many views and they dont have any comments about the carl. I have a trade open for 2.33 and I have very few views and no comments.
Sellers that are unable to sell the carl
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8371032 (3ref)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8739876 (3ref)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8765178 (3ref)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8683840 (3ref)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8774349 (3ref)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8478040 (1key)
My trade (selling) 2.33ref: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8794495
Look, give evidence, like trade posts. So everyone can see if it should really be lowered
UPDATE:
I just sold my carl (after trying to sell it for about a day) to someone for 2.33ref off of outpost. http://i.imgur.com/UIiLzO2.png
I am not trying to make a profit off of this suggestion. I am simply tying to make the price on the Carl more accurate.
Obviously you're not trying to make profit when you're lowering the price because you are an impatient trader.
You need proof dude. The only thing I see going down right now is your reputation. Down vote.
Counter-Proof:
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8793579 -- Unsuccessful to buy @ 2.33 for 10hrs
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8641145 -- Unsuccessful to buy @ 2ref for 1 week (Though it's not on the right side, so it's harder to find)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8783965 -- Willing to pay 2.66, hasn't bumped since posted though
http://bazaar.tf/trade/142145 -- 1 day old, Sold @ 2.66-3 (5 hours ago)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8760122 -- Doesn't look to have bought any at 2.33, but I'm not quite sure of his vague trading "methods".
Not much I can show on the buying side as there are only 1.5 pages, will keep searching though
Yeah, I looked through Outpost myself, and I don't see 2.00-2.33 being a reasonable range, especially not 2.00. If I were the suggestion creator, I'd wait to see what happens to the "unsuccessful" trades that he posted, because many of them are extremely recent (a day old or less). If those trades at 3.00 fail to sell in a few days, then maybe 2.66 flat is a more reasonable suggestion to make, assuming that proof of 2.66 sales is available.
Yeah. I have thought about making a new suggestion because 2.66-3 doesn't seem viable anymore, but so far I can't really see many sales for the item at all, whether it's 2, 2.33, 2.66, or 3
all those links are unsold at 3 ref proof of 2 ref?