Suggestion: Teddy Roosebelt at 1.33–1.66 ref

Price Suggestion

Teddy Roosebelt

Submitted Wed, 06 Mar 13 21:00:32 +0000 by ★ Bomjahed

86.96%

1.66 ref

1.33–1.66 ref

~1.44 ref

80 votes up

12 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Thu, 07 Mar 13 04:21:37 +0000 by Puddilicious.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Lots of them on OP for 1.66 ref each,no interest for these.About ~20 trades who are buying for 1.22-1.33,and trying to resell for 1.66 with no success.No buyers for 1.66.

Links:

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9068132[/url] - 1.44 ref,unsold.

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9085386[/url] - 1.66 ref,unsold.

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/5828610[/url] - 1.66 ref,unsold for 4 months(wut??)

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9050902[/url] - 1.66 ref,unsold.

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9072689[/url] - 1.66 ref,unsold.

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8985081[/url] - 1.66 ref,unsold.

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8489641[/url] - bought one for 1.33.

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8505954[/url] - bought one for 1.33,got another add for 1.33.

[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8599637[/url] - bought one for 1.33.

So shouldn't the price just be 1.33? Are there enough still being sold at 1.66 to keep it in the range?

Idk.Some people could say "whoa,people are selling them for bigger price than 1.33,you are idiot,downvote",i dont want anyone to do so.

Tell them that it doesn't matter if people are selling them for 1.66 if no one ends up buying them for 1.66. I'll upvote this suggestion because it's more accurate than just 1.66, but there may be enough proof to make it just 1.33.

You could make 1.33 ref suggestion yourself, i'm too tired to do it right now.

I think your suggested range is fine, afterall you're only putting a range on it instead of being a flat price.

I am Up V