Price Suggestion
~144 keys
sunbeams
Unusual Coupe D'isaster Sunbeams
25 votes up
21 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted by A Distinctive Lack of Vincent.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Ok so I saw a recent suggestion for this hat that had the high range value a little too high, so I decided to change it a bit and make it right. The proof can be shown here:


http://backpack.tf/vote/id/5138771f4bd7b8d762000005#5138b5364bd7b8cd67000003_row (which got offered 3 pure + orbiting fire toque (~4 buds) in the proof.)


Additionally, I would like to add on that one got offered a scorching big elfin deal which is ~4 buds. here http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8823563

    You do not value unusuals at full price when they offered on your trade. The Scorching Big Elfin is currently valued at 3.7-4.3 buds, so it should be considered at the low-end when you are using it to price another unusual. Additionally the sweets (the rest of the set) is worth around ~4 keys which is ~.2 buds making that offer 3.5 buds.

      Did you see the offer of the 3 pure + orbiting fire toque? I think my proof and range is fine.

        It's going to take more than a single near pure offer to be considered concrete proof that this deserves a raise. Downvote.

          I'm not saying there's anything wrong with your proof, and to quote myself from the previous suggestion:


          (Underneath [SP33DY]Jerrinho)


          "3 buds pure and an orbiting tough guys toque offered by Jackpot (2 weeks ago) in Link 1 which is actually slightly less than 4 buds, but it's roughly a ~3.75 bud offer."


          "How much does being in that set add? Like 4-5 keys? That's .2 buds, if you want to be persnickety about it, then I guess you could say it was 3.5 bugs for the unusual coupe alone."


          Anyways: I'm simply saying that an offer of a Big Elfin would not be considered 4 buds pure and that has to be taken into consideration when pricing an unusual. I did not voice a complaint about this suggestion, simply how it was composed.

            Ok, thank you for the comment.