Suggestion: Bonk Boy at 1.66–2 ref

More proof will be added as needed, but feel free to post more proof/counter proof below! I'm new at this also, only my second suggestion, so don't hate on me too bad.

those offers got rejected, counters a bit your proof.

Yes, but those are what people are offering and willing to pay for the item. The demand for the item is WAY down, and many people are not willing to pay 2 ref for it, as I showed in how long the 2 ref sellers tried to sell it for (in which they still have yet to sell them).

i offer 2 keys for bill thats what am willing to pay for it

What I'm trying to say is that the majority of the people are offering and willing to pay 1.66 ref. As you may know, many people buy a Bill's Hat for 8 keys and are actually WILLING to pay that much for it.

Offers shouldn't be considered as proof for the lower end. If I offer someone 5 keys for their buds, then should we lower the bottom end of buds to 5 keys?

No, but the offers are what people are willing to pay for, and many of the trades that are selling for 2 ref are VERY old and don't sell with in even a month.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9097625 Is lvl 69 and was offered 1.66 still.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8403371 Was 3 weeks ago

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9135335 This guys buying for 2 ref (*Was* I just sold it to him.)

Also, were they offered? Yes. Were they accepted? NO.

Yes, but not many people are buying them for 2 ref. People are not accepting them because the listed price on both bp.tf AND spreadsheet is 2 ref, so if someone sells lower than 2 ref it is very rare. I am suggesting this price because most people are offering 1.66 ref for them AND because they are VERY hard to sell at the current price.

Well offers =/= sales. This site runs off of sales not offers. If you can find people selling under 2 ref, then this suggestion would be much more valid. As is you have a lot of proof, but most of it doesn't matter.

these look awesome....

Thanks for contributing to the discussion with your totally useful comment.

(This comment is useless too.)

No, there are no listed prices at 1.66 ref as far as I know, but all listed prices for 2 ref are very old and many people are offering at 1.66-1.88 ref. Some do offer 2 ref but very rarely, and that is why I left the high end at 2 ref.

if it is more common at 1.66 - 1.88 why not suggest that? Yes people offer 2, but like you said it is really rare

Because 2 ref is still offered, and if I completely removed that then that means Bonk Boys are ONLY sold at 1.66-1.88 ref.

I agree with this, It was VERY hard for me to sell for 2 ref. But finally sold it to a guy who loved scout

Not that hard to sell for 2 ref. Last week I was willing to buy one for 2 ref, which I did.And later crafted one by myself & resold for 2 ref. Downvoting

You still have the one that you crafted in your backpack......

Sold for 2 Ref no problem. Only 20 views on OP and 2 people offering before the actual trade of 2 Ref.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9142410

Good counter proof, but as you see that is only one out of the many trades that people are selling the Bonk Boy and have for 2 ref, and I'm glad you sold it fast. Many people are just not interested in it and are not willing to pay 2 ref for it. But as you see, I left in 2 ref in the price suggestion because people do offer 2 ref.

MORE PROOF

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/6593936 Selling at 2 ref, 3 months old and offered 1.66 ref

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8807411 Selling for 2 ref, 2 weeks old

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8679572 Offered 2 ref, then retracted. Offered craft hat and a rec. 2 weeks old

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8886046 Selling for 2 ref, no offers, 1 week old.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8810676 Offered 1.88 ref, 2 weeks old

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9130784 Offered Surgeon's Stahlhelm

Next time, for better support, show people selling or successful buyers at 1.66.

I'm accepting this because of the votes and the ones that are unsold for too long.

Alright, thanks for the suggestion! I'll keep that in mind next time!