Suggestion: Strange Natascha at 0.44–0.77 ref

Price Suggestion

~3 ref

77 votes up

30 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Sun, 10 Mar 13 22:43:24 +0000 by [GIRL] Mr. Bucket.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

The last suggestion was a joke. Every single link was only bumped once or twice.

Here is MY COUNTERPROOF TO THE LAST SUGGESTION. Everything in caps is what I have added next to the 'proof'. Literally every trade that was used for proof HAS NEVER BEEN BUMPED OR IS ONLY BUMPED EVERY FEW DAYS.

THE PROOF USED TO JUSTIFY A LOWER PRICE:

0.66 ref

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8887143 - 1 week, few offers, one at asking price but still has it [WAS ONLY BUMPED ONCE AND THAT WAS 6 DAYS AGO]

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8892537 - 1 week, added for price, but still has it. [ONLY BUMPED ONCE IN PAST WEEK]

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9064868 - 3 days, no offers [NOT BUMPED EVEN ONCE]

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8914097 - 2 days last bump, no offers [BUMPED ONCE]

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9061245 - 1 day last bump no offers [BUMPED 1 DAY AGO]

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9059718 - 1 day, no interest [BUMPED ONCE]

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9119589 - 16 hours, no interest [TOOK OFF MARKET]

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9121730 - 13 hours, no interest [NOT EVEN BUMPED ONCE OTHER THAN PUTTING IT UP]

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9104282 - 8 hours, no interest [VERY YOUNG TRADE, ONLY 2 DAYS OLD, INFREQUENT BUMPER]

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9128718 - 4 hours, no offers [VERY YOUNG TRADE, HASN'T BUMPED, CLOSED]

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9128215 - 4 hours, no offers [SAME USER AS ABOVE, ABOVE TRADE WAS CLOSED]

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9093057 - 2 hours, one offer of .55, rejected [OLNLY 3 DAYS OLD, INFREQUENT BUMPER]

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9092546 - 1 hour, no offers [HAS BUMPS, BUT ONLY A FEW DAYS OLD]

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9119248 - 1 hour, no interest [TRADE CLOSED]

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9107369 - 1 hour, no interest [2 DAYS OLD]

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9122121 - 40 minutes, no interest [DAY OLD]

Offers

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8964981 - 1 week old, 1 offer of .33 rejected [HASN'T BUMPED FOR 7 DAYS]

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8976515 - 1 week old, 1 offer of .33 rejected [HASN'T BUMPED FOR 6 DAYS]

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9048462 - 4 days old. [HASN'T BUMPED AT ALL]

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9090639 - 2 days old, offered .33 [HASN'T BUMPED AT ALL]

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9090971 - 2 days, no offers [HASTN'T BUMPED AT ALL]

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9102786 - 1 day, no offers [HASN'T BUMPED AT ALL]

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9104561 - 1 day, no offers [HASN'T BUMPED AT ALL]

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9092428 - 3 hours, no offers [ONLY WANTS DOTA 2, HASN'T BUMPD AT ALL]

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8922976 - 3 hours, no offers [ONLY WANTS DOTA 2 OFFERS, INFREQUENT BUMPER]

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8466900 - 1 hour, no offers [GOT OFFERED .66]

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9086919 - 1 hour, no offers [INFREQUENT BUMPER]

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8942041 - 1 hour, offered .66 but still has it. [SUPPORT CURRENT PRICE]

MY PROOF OF A LARGER RANGE BEING MORE APPROPRIATE, USING BUMPED TRADES THAT ARE CURRENT:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9123020 Sold for .55, less than a day old

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9115997 Offered a V. Uber, less than a day old

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9145584 has a seller for one at .66

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/5910321 Has about a million offers for natasha at .66, guy never responds

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8246586 Sold 2 for a ref

The above links are bumped often and are older than a week. Also, literally NOBODY sells a Natasha for .33, every offer of .33 has been hidden on ALL the trades. The absolute lowest people will go is .44, unless it's a quicksell. I agree that the Natasha range needed to be opened up a bit, but dropping it to .33 is way too low, and I think that .77 is more reaonsable, as the 1 ref sales have shown, and there are about 5 people that offered .66 for the natasha, but the offers were all rejected.

Some ones a bit mad... I'm glad you show proof, but I had a good laugh seeing you have 25 yourself. I'll look over the proof and let you know what I think! :D

Looks good to me :) Upvote.

Another thing, I didn't just use bumped trades, I used all most every trade. The reasoning behind that was if there was a higher demand for these, the trades that hadn't been bumped, at lower prices, would have been found. But I'll be honest, the .33 was a stretch, I knew it was. But I'm glad someone is giving a bit more justice then I (since I myself don't care to much except for the update in price).

And thanks :P

I just got a little jimmie rustled over the fact that this was accepted XP

Took me an hour to do all this research :P

Well sheeet, you could have just messaged me, I would have helped. :P But it looks like my .33 trade proof closed, the guy never ended up selling it.

Not to sure where the .77 is coming from however. You show that there is quite a bit (relatively speaking) of demand at 2 rec. Just one trade selling at 1 ref, warrants the range? I suppose, if I got away with a single .33 trade to validate my proof so can you! :P

The reason I put .66 is because many people (myself included) have rejected .66, indicating a higher price. And because there were only a few sales at one ref, I didn't set the high range at that, but rather at .77 to get a better average.

i also think the last price was too low, as mentioned, i buy for 0.55 and have got 3 pieces in about 2 months. It`s just an item which got rarely traded compared to others but it goes for 1ref also. upvote here