- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8539533 sold for a clean wep
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/2282331 sold at 1 scrap
sorry for bothering you but what is the rep required to make a price suggestion?
0 points, you currently have 6.
then why can't I make a suggestion?
What suggestion are you trying to make?
for any item...for example I type in Conniver's kunai ( random item ) click on the strange variant ( random variant ) and it wont let me click in the spaces for ref or keys or buds
Don't click in the greyed out boxes below "buds"/"keys"/"refined". Select your currency from the box under "currency" then put in your price under "low value" and "high value(optional)". Or was it a different problem?
ah thanks that rlly helped i feel like an idiot
I think it is to help with troll suggestions?
That is if they have something that makes you have rep before making suggestions, didn't know they ever had that.
Time to raise all the uncrafts....
Side note: Why people are paying more for this than the craftable?
They're about 10 times rarer than clean ones.
People are weird.
collector. lot of people dont give a shit about uncraft so they never put the uncraft on sale which resulting in a limited supply.
Altough this is true, it's happens since forever, so why raising them now?... We have all see uncrafts collection all the time. Maybe it's about a rumor that weapons in store are craftable as hats now, but that's bullshit, and people are taking profit from it.
I accept that your proof is good, but I will not vote in any uncraft wep suggestion, mainly because I think it's stupid raising this kind of price.
only cosmetic items in store are now clean.
I know... That's what I said! ;)
Good Luck with the suggestion, I will not vote only because of principles! ;)
why not 0.05 ~ 0.11? it looks better based on your proof