Price Suggestion
Vintage Merryweather
Submitted by Fang
~1.44 ref
Unique Vintage Merryweather
20 votes up
30 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed by the submitter.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

I'd like to call this the Duscoda proof as I will only be using trades a day old and above and that have been bumped within the last 3 hours. Let's get started shall we.

DA RULEZ:

When lowering the price of something you need links to trades at the high end that have been actively bumped and existed for atleast 2-3 days unsold. Its common to not sell an item in the first day or so, especially if its as niche as a genuine weapon. Trades that are never bumped don't prove anything because chances are nobody noticed it.

You also shouldn't use buyer trades unless they are buying tons of the item in a very short period of time.

Duscoda (what I'll be calling my proof because it's the best evur.) :

Unsold at 1.66 Ref:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9547010

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9537607

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9560014

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9499386

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9374920

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9540226 - My duscoda.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9556816

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9530358

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9191465 - 1 add confirmation of duscoda needed.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9520515

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9563254

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9555158

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9563262 - same duscoda as above.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9498854

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9470681

I would use more proof but master duscoda will not allow that.

No Duscoda buyers.

Hail Duscoda. 2013.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9575169 - sold for 1.66

And may I ask you - where is the sellers at 1.33 ref?

Sorry, but it's a downvote.

    Duscoda is right, lowering prices based on trades not being taken in under a day, or ones that have not been bumped. These have not had a fair chance on the market and therefore cannot be seen as a loss in demand. Its the proper way to do this kind of proof, not just his way.

      Proof is good yes?