Suggestion: Strange Big Earner at 0.66–1 ref

Price Suggestion

~2.2 keys

142 votes up

63 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed Fri, 29 Mar 13 18:00:05 +0000 by SirJjjon.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

There are many SELLING for .66-1 ref, just didnt show it because selling=/=sold

Went for quality rather than quantity

Proof

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8219798 -rejected 3 offers for .44

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/7840786 -sold 2 for a ref each

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/7830362 - ref offer

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9461416 -3 rejected offers for .66

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8374616 -sold for 1 ref

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9296797 -sold for 1 ref

http://backpack.tf/classifieds/search/big%20earner - 1 offer 1 ref 1 offer 1.33

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/7597673 -sold 3 for 1 ref

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9391457 -sold 1 for 1 ref

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9081681 -sold 2 for 1 ref

on an item this common I would say a bit more proof is needed, especially when the last suggestion was only accepted 3 days ago

working on it

there are actually not that many on OP

not hating, but classifieds aren't really offers, you should rewrite that into sellers

ik classifieds arent offers i just put it there to prove that there are no sellers .44-.66 at all

This could be true but a little more proof would be good.

did you see the proof? did you check outpost?

1. There aren't that many on outpost

2. The proof shows offers and solds....dats pretty good.

3. What kind of proof do you want?

when there aren`t more trades to show, just write it in your suggestion, best i think.

well there are 7pages of in on op so thats quite a lot.

I just thought that it would be better if there would be more links.

7 pages isnt a lot dude...

so you can only give only 10 links when there are 7pages? btw every page has 20trades.

so your telling me i should have 140 trades? Check other suggestions dude. THere are many links because its a popular item...this ones not

I dont say that you need 140 links, just some more then 10. For example a bk medi gun mk2 has only 3pages on op but this suggestion has 23links http://backpack.tf/vote/id/5150cde8ba2536d429000004 I think that if there are 140trades on op then 10links wouldnt be enought. Thats just what i think...

I have more than 10 do you not see the "sold 2"? Its not all about links dude. ITs the QUALITY

wouldnt say that, 3 good links are better than 10 not that good. A few buyers would have been interesting.

to clear all confusion: (no just for haha)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9417651

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9573432 - 0.44

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8337579 - 0.55

what a bunch of lowballers, at least one pays 0.55, helps nothing tho, maybe that 0.44 is too low

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9296797 Which you said sold for 1 ref, there is no evidence of this but there is a .66 offer.

Third last link has 2 recent buyers that we can see, and the last link has none that we can see.

I'm not sure where you're seeing how many they sold.

in the offerers bp

So have you been tracking these people's backpacks then?

hell no...too lazy....just looking at the offers and i see that as buying trades...

There were no 1 ref offers on some of them...

ah mistaked the first link for selling rather than sold my bad... and which one was the third last?

I actually sold that thing 2 days ago for S.Spy-cicle and sold the Spy-cicle for 1 Ref. I can't provide the screenshot because I can't open anything on steam which requires internet :/ (e.g Store, Community, Profile)

Upvote for me

yay my first positive comment

Sold mine for a refined ( http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9623199 ) to this person : http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9623199 .

where is your proof :/. all i see is a closed trade

Whoops. Here's the guy's backpack: http://www.tf2outpost.com/backpack/268522

I don't have a Big Earner. That guy has a big earner, with my name in the history.

image of trade? Cant see if you actually sold it for that price

EDIT: wtf is wrong with me. You're helping me. Ive been completely blind

Thank you for your support sorry for being an idiot

Here's proof:

http://i.imgur.com/VBdZL6J.png

actually most of your 1 ref proof is not valid since they were sold before price change and after a rise sellers rise a price so it s pretty possible if those adds were for 0,66 (old price)

i d say 0,66 flat is best price

staying neutral now