Suggestion: Non-Craftable Ol' Snaggletooth at 1–1.33 ref

Price Suggestion

~9.44 ref

79 votes up

95 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed Thu, 11 Apr 13 21:58:02 +0000 by An Average NTR Enjoyer.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

No demand for this at all - No trades on TF2 outpost and 2 on Bazaar.tf, one of which is a clean hat to dirty hat switch trade, the other is trading a hat worth 1.33 for it ([url]http://bazaar.tf/trade/184502[/url]). The last time the price was updated is too long ago to be reliable still.

I would say that 1.33 flat is better, reason:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9924012 - Rejected 1 ref. offer

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9909746 - Rejected 1.33 offer, wants 1.66

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9946276 - 2 rejected 1.33 offers and 1 rejected 1 ref. offer

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9874929 - Rejected 1.33 offer

http://bazaar.tf/trade/184502 - Your link, buys for 1 craft hat, 1.33 ref.

Wanna resuggest?

If not, then I'll make a counter suggestion.

Actually, current range is fine.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9888217 - Sold at 1.66 ref, click the item

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9874929 - Sold at bp.tf price, 1.66 I presume, click the item

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9986133 - Also sold at 1.66 ref, click the item

Current range looks good, downvoted.

I couldn't find those, but 3 trades aren't really good enough to warrant it being the average price. I may change it to 1.44 flat, though.

You have no proof of 1.44 flat, the current range is fine, you can't change it.

And 3 is a lot, compared to that there's only 1 page of sellers.

But the fact that there's only a page of sellers shows that there's no demand for it. I also mistyped 1.44, I meant 1.33.

No, it shows that they're kinda rare...

According to stats.tf, 49% of them were purchased of 70,577. So you can't really say it's rare.

NO TRADES ON TF2 OUTPOST?

http://www.tf2outpost.com/search/96677476

Those are trying to sell, not looking to buy.

You don't know how this site works do you?

The fact that people are selling for a price does not dictate their actual price. Many people try to make a profit so people selling becomes an unreliable source. The prices they are actually sold for are reliable because it's what people are willing to pay for it. It really is a just a vicious cycle but it's the only thing people can work from.

So the tf2op low-ballers are better? OK MATE

OK but where is proof ?:

The proof is that no one is buying it at 1.33 to 1.66, which is proven by the lack of trades looking for a dirty snaggletooth.

literally no proof for this at all

The proof is that there's no proof for it being sold for 1.33 to 1.66.

so why don't you show some proper links to back up your argument

Sold mine for a Genuine King of Scotland Cape!! <anomaly, but still awesome :D

Can't respond so I'll do it here.

Well, it's rare on outpost, only 1 page, it has nothing to do with demand.

If 3 of 17 trades have sold, then that means that a mere 17% have been sold. The logical explanation of this is that no one wants a dirty snaggletooth.

So 17% is no one?

No, some people want this, but not everyone is willing to pay 1.66, but just that it's sellable at 1.66 means it should be in the range.

A tiny minority buying for 1.66 does not mean that 1.66 should be the upper boundary, it means that some people want to sell for more just so they can make a profit.

How do you know there isn't any closed 1.66, which is sold?

And also, if it's sellable, to a certain degree, at 1.66, it needs to be in the range.

if 1.33 offers are being rejected, that means it's hard to buy for that price. It doesn't make sense to drop the low end to 1 ref in this case.