Suggestion: Orbiting Planets Towering Pillar of Hats at 41.56–51.95 keys

Price Suggestion

~16 keys

o.plnts

41 votes up

9 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Sat, 20 Apr 13 23:06:55 +0000 by [GIRL] Mr. Bucket.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9623103 -2 buds(3 weeks)best offer:1 bud+21 keys

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9266886 (1 month) best offer: steaming beanie+voodoo juju(1.7~ with unusal overpay)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10027086 2.5 buds(1 week) low interest best offer:1 bud+14 keys

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10105885 bo 2.3~ buds no offers

summary: low offers. and low untaken buyouts.

I didn't steal proof from the last suggestion because he didn't even provide proof.

I don't really understand the range you put on there. If the best offer is almost 2 buds, why have the high end be 2.5? Sure people have B/O's set to 2.5, but that shouldn't be the high price

new buyout of 2.5 that's why

and you have to count that people lowball/want to profit so will offer lower. ex: just because a hat got an offer of 1.5 doesn't mean it needs to be 1.5

Right, but 1) B/O != price, people on outpost can set it to whatever, doesn't mean it's worth that. You have to account for high-ballers

And 2) if the most people have offered is around 2 buds, that shows that interest in the hat isn't high enough to warrant the hat 2.5 buds for a high end

people who offer can offer whatever they won't whether it's low or high

they can offer whatever they want. shouldn't be the price though

So your justification for the range is that no one will follow it and will do what they want? That's a pretty poor excuse imo. Most of the unusual prices are rather off, so shouldn't we be trying to improve the quality of the suggestions here, as opposed to giving this site more bad reputation?

You're not even reading my comments

I'm done

Rofl you edited your comments you little bugger. Nice try though, downvote from me.

P.s. It clearly says under your post "modified _ minutes ago." gj, cyu@lan

my justification

offers shouldn't crash prices. just because there low

No, offers should dictate prices. If the buyer doesn't want to comply to a price, then sellers will be forced to sell for lower in return. It's basic economics, please take a course in economics before you try to justify your price range here. And again, I could say the same to you about B/O's and how they don't raise prices just because they're high.

RDusk · posted about a minute ago · Score: 0Like·Dislike

replying to this

1. It's a game. sorry I don't spend all my time reading about tf2 economics

2. bos dont rise prices, offers don't lower prices

offers raise prices, bos lower prices

3. you clearly don't know what your talking about. you have made 1 price suggestion that got passed

4. get out I don't need your opinion

1. Real life economics, an area that everyone should learn, applies just as much to tf2 as any other economy, whether it be virtual or real.

2. I'm going to provide counter proof for you, just so understand why the price range is wrong.

- http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8629510 hat in the third link you gave, 1:1 for a stormy charmer's. bp.tf has this at 2.3 mid range, 2.1 with unusual overpay

- http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9623103 This link you provided is excellent counter-proof to yourself. His B/O is 2 pure, and he can't get that price for another month. His B/O should be dictating prices, as you mentioned earlier.

Seriously, lrn2createasolidargument

3. Ok, I've made 1 suggestion on unusuals. I still have a much better knowledge of basic economic concepts than you, it seems. And also, most of the suggestions you've made have only been accepted after you've made an incorrect suggestion and then gotten advice from other people.

4. rofl ok nerd

edit: links don't work? not sure, but whatever

for some reason i can't comment on your other posts

1. your trying to call me a nerd because i don't say rofl and read about economics

2. you say i only make suggestions after someone corrected. look at my past suggestions fool

3. you've made 1 suggestion. and you know nothing about prices of unusuals.

please think you insolent child

your counter proof. is just more proof

you think you know what your talking about. but your don't

the 2 buds is proof that it needs a drop.

I realize now that the reasoning for your autism-inducing argument is caused by a lack of understanding (on your part, as usual) of what the actual argument is. I agree with you that this hat needs a price drop, sure. But your high range is stupid, as the link that we both provided as proof prove that assumption correct.

>4. get out I don't need your opinion

My opinion is only trying to help your pathetic suggestion get passed (albeit it'll have to be on a different suggestion). If you don't take people's suggestions, then you're on the wrong website.

>3. you've made 1 suggestion. and you know nothing about prices of unusuals.

Hah, that amuses me. You've been playing this game for less than 1000 hours, hell, less than a year, and you think you know more about hats than me? You yourself said, "1. It's a game. sorry I don't spend all my time reading about tf2 economics," proving that you yourself don't even know correct pricing. Seriously, I don't even know how you think you can argue this anymore; you've already put yourself into such a rut that it'd be near impossible to get this price suggestion passed. And I've made one suggestion, yay me. Mattie, the player with the most expensive backpack in this game and the player who probably knows more about virtual hats than most other people, has made a total of 0 price suggestions. Does that mean he's a worthless scrub? No, because any mentally-stable person would know that knowledge != participation. Seriously, people learn this in fucking middle school. Smart kids are almost never the most vocal, and this applies to every other facet of life, including TF2.

>please think you insolent child

>but your don't

>your trying to call me a nerd

>absolutely no capital letters anywhere

Yeah ok, that's nice.

If someone has a B/O of 2 buds, that lowers the price. The high range should be at 2 buds, not the low range.

^ this guy understands

that wouldn't work if i did something like 1.5-2 there is no proof of 1.5

flat 2 wouldn't work like the other suggestion. because a hat with 30 or so in existance shouldn't have a flat price

Who said a range of .5 buds had to happen? Just shorten the range, honestly, it's not that hard to comprehend

your not comprehending that I dom't care what you think

and you can't even provide counter proof

Hah, ok kiddie, I think it's time to get off the family computer today. Quoted from earlier: " http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9623103 This link you provided is excellent counter-proof to yourself." You yourself gave a link to an unsold one of these at your low end. This is easily the biggest piece of counter evidence that anyone could provide, as it renders your high end completely and utterly null. Seriously, I don't understand what amount of down's you've become possessed by, but if you would open your eyes for even a second, you could realize that your suggestion is simply false. I don't even get how you continue to argue against such when you've already proved your own suggestion wrong.

I know it's hard for you to get off the computer because that's what you do all day. I don't know your age neither do you but by your comments i can assume your a 14 year old, my suggestion is not false. it definatley needs a drop. I'm not to make it 1.5-2 because there's no proof of 1.5

I'm done eith you. you don't know what you're talking sbout. if you think it should be 1.5-2 or some other dumb price. make a suggestion and let it get rejected

Furthermore, it doesn't matter what I think. What matters is what is correct, which, in this case, happens to be what I think. So I don't care if you "dom't care what [I] think," you need to realize that you're simply wrong, and no amount of brain-damaged argument is going to make this price suggestion correct

In response to "I know it's hard..."

I, RDusk, nowhere in my argument said that the price should be 1.5-2. I don't know what kind of hallucinogens you're on currently, but I never once said that's the price. Furthermore, there is no concrete rule that the price range has to be in .5 increments. Please, just close this suggestion down and make the range 1.8-2.1 or something stupid, I don't fucking care.

>I'm done eith you. 2 minutes ago

>You're not even reading my comments

I'm done

DemoPan · modified about 2 hours ago

Again, I think it's bedtime for you, young'un. Please learn to create a solid argument while not high and come back to this site later

you're one persistant 5 year old

I'm not here to agrue to your elementray comments

make a suggestion if you don't like this price.

I don't know why your trying so hard probaly because you have nothing better to do

you're one persistant 5 year old

I'm not here to agrue to your elementray comments

make a suggestion if you don't like this price.

I don't know why your trying so hard probaly because you have nothing better to do

DemoPan · posted 3 minutes ago · Score: 0

*persistent

*argue

*elementary

*probably

And I am creating another price, I originally commented here because I thought you would want to listen to the voice of reason, but instead, your autism-clouded mind prevented you from seeing the logic in all of my posts, and you still find yourself arguing such insignificant details.

check my out my vote, im trying to set the price to about 2 - 2.4

you mean 2 buds flat which is your suggestion

unusuals need a range ecspecially when there's a large number on op and in existance

i set it at a range, yet it didn't come out as one in the comments i put it should be 2 - 2.4