- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
Last suggestion for 19-21 keys was closed (25% upvoted). So I am resuggesting at 20-22 with the exact same proof even though 19-21 may be more accurate.
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10092672 - B/O 1 buds
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9530733 - sold for 20 keys
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10184290 - sold for 21 keys (took a week+ to sell, multiple trades opened and closed)
Current Trades:
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9201348 - best offer in last month of 19 keys
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8988436 - no offers in a month
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10067578 - best offer of 19.5 in unusuals
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10275777 - best offer of 19.5 in unusuals
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10134641 - no offers on gym rat alone
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10301162 - selling for 1 buds
On a side note, I apologize to all the people I convinced on the previous suggestion that mods base proof primarily on the value of the proof. The proof here is exactly the same as the one there.
And to all you people who downvoted, tell me why you would downvote an accurate price range...
Im pretty sure almost all that downvoted did so either prior to you providing proof that it was indeed accurate or without opening the suggestion to see proof was provided by someone other than OP.
I know. But does that make it okay? Should you downvote something just for rep. That's rather pathetic, is it not? If something is accurate, it shouldn't be downvoted. And if you don't know the value of a hat, just don't vote!
"While this may be somewhat accurate, it's beyond the point where its acceptable due to the downvote ratio." Mr. Bucket, on the previous suggestion
This suggestion should have been made with the same range as before: the problem was not the proof left in the comments, but the downvotes - mostly caused becaused the previous suggestion op was daft.
Even then, your proof shows that 20-22 is still more accurate than the current range.
Honestly, this is more accurate than 19-21 since there is no seller who has actually accepted 19 keys. And I understand why Bucket went the way he did. I'm questioning why people would downvote a relatively accurate range.
Most people seem to go by the "no proof = downvote" mantra, which is terrible and ruins most of this site. Some people don't fully understand what they're doing when they make a suggestion. It was a correct suggestion though, and thank you for remaking it!
My point, exactly. Thank you.