Suggestion: Non-Craftable Attendant at 2.33–2.66 ref

Price Suggestion

~16.5 ref

62 votes up

25 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Thu, 25 Apr 13 03:16:37 +0000 by Puddilicious.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10316684 2.33 ref

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10243813 rejected 2.33 ref

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10073307 rejected 2.33 ref

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9863349 rejected 2.44 ref

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10238486 1 ref + dirty Sultan + S.SH (2.66 ref mixed) - rejected

[WTF] GazzyMonkey (2 days ago)

dirty Sir Hootsalot (2.66 ref in items) - rejected

Jucchan42 (3 days ago)

G.Concheror (2.33 ref in items) - rejected

TheMeta4096 (3 days ago)

2.66 ref - rejected

Thanks friend.

This one seems good. Upvote

You know there's only one semi-real proof

better than the other suggestion was rather what i meant. and better than current range

Then you should upvote for that? There's really no evidence that the price should increase. Of course people would want more then the suggested price.

Uncraftable prices need special care (they are little bitches), the fact that 2.33 and 2.66 offers are rejected show that 2.33 flat is wrong. of course showing the exact value of items is impossible (specially with uncrafts), there are always trades which happen outside the bp.tf range, but the intention is to represent it at its best. This suggested price is more accurate than the current one, therefore i upvote, yes