Suggestion: Burning Flames Magnificent Mongolian at 46.86–55.38 keys

My low end will be 2.2 (the screenshotted purchase) and the high end 2.6, as that's the highest offer this got. The b/o of 2.5 is WAY too new, and as offers got over that value I think it's a quicksell. Therefore I suggest 2.2-2.6

Non sense change. 2.1-2.6 for 2.2-2.6. It is useless.

Downvote for this price.

upvoe for this price, I say.

Hey, the guy who doesn't get this site is here. Well, it's mainly an update. This price is over 2 months old, so I'm showing the old price still was correct. Before Chief Shoe warns me again, http://backpack.tf/vote/id/518387a4ba2536336300000b check the comments here. He really is annoying and insulting.

ohh its you, stop be idiot. You cant suggest price, really.

Will you please stop commenting on my suggestions? I have already blocked you on steam for being a major douch, but I would really like to be able to block you here. For the fact that I can't suggest prices, http://backpack.tf/top/contributors I'm the #45th most contributing person to this website, and rising FAST. I really searched, but I never found you there.

p.s.

nice suggestions you've got mate

http://backpack.tf/vote/id/51237d7f4bd7b8cd3b00000b

http://backpack.tf/vote/id/517f5ca54bd7b8c976000002

http://backpack.tf/vote/id/517fbb6bba25368f0f00000a (as long218 says "terrible")

Whenever an unusual was last priced 2 or more months ago, it needs to be updated. If the price is virtually the same, it still needs to be suggested. This prevents people from dismissing prices on here as being too old even if they are still valid.

Now if this was being suggested and the last price was accepted like a month ago, then you would be correct in this suggestion being pointless. But its not. Its 3 months old and needs to be reconfirmed.