Price Suggestion
Non-Craftable Officer's Ushanka
Submitted by ★ Christley </3 Peelz
61.98%
0.66–1 ref
0.77–1 ref
12
~11.33 ref
Unique Officer's Ushanka
75 votes up
46 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions
Bentry Suster
86.49%
7 ref
11.33 ref
...
90.91%
5.77–6.11 ref
7 ref
PestControl
93.33%
3.22–5 ref
5.77–6.11 ref

This suggestion was accepted by Puddilicious.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10185806 - rejected 0.88 twice, also 0.77

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10673129 - sold in 2 hrs for 1 ref

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10410245 - rejected 2 rec

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10621565 - rejected 0.77

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10377122 - rejected 0.77


cant find any sold ones, so leaving range at 0.77 because most dont attract offers even after 2 weeks

Avatar ★ Christley </3 Peelz · posted

    3 rejected offers of .77 and another of .88, I would say .88-1 would be even better

    Avatar ★ PEASANT · posted

      so would i. but i cant prove that they've sold for it. which is why im going easy

      Avatar ★ Christley </3 Peelz · posted

    its still in the current range. i find this suggestion pointless.

    Avatar ★ PeaceMK · modified
      Avatar ★ ripike · deleted by the submitter

        why would it be pointless if people are offering more than the lower end and still cant get it? that means the lower end is pointless and not this suggestion

        Avatar ★ Christley </3 Peelz · posted

          Because low-end is usually for buyers? seller wants to sell for full price to get profit? Welcome to Mannconomy.


          Please mainly focus on buyers if you want to increase low-end price

          Avatar ★ PeaceMK · modified

            ... i am. have you even looked at the proof?

            ive provided 3 rejects at 0.77, one at 2 rec and 2 at 0.88 and that it sold at 1 ref.

            HOW is that not focusing on buyers?


            edit: yeah, downvoting my comments help you out

            Avatar ★ Christley </3 Peelz · modified
        Avatar ★ alfred · deleted by the submitter

          ive shown people trying for more than that and fails. should i show offers of 0.66 instead of 0.77 since those doesnt seem to count?

          Avatar ★ Christley </3 Peelz · posted

            It's just that you don't really have much proof of either price, I'll go have a look on outpost first before I start making false accusations.

            Avatar ★ alfred · posted

              All I seem to see is unsold ushankas at 1 ref. Taking another look at your proof, it seems to be relatively sound, but more would be required for my upvote. I'm remaining neutral for now, thank you for explaining, I'll delete my original comment to avoid negative vibes in the comments section.

              Avatar ★ alfred · modified