Price Suggestion
Knife
Submitted by ★ DarkGenex
56.15%
0.66–1 ref
0.77–1 ref
11
~1.33 ref
Unique Knife
105 votes up
82 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions
Moose
92.86%
1 ref
1.33 ref
Moose
100%
1.11–1.33 ref
1 ref
...
96%
1.22–2 ref
1.11–1.33 ref

This suggestion was closed by An Average NTR Enjoyer.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

    I think he forgot to specify strange in that last link? maybe.


    Upvote anyway, people don't want to sell for .66

    Avatar ★ JeefBerky · posted

      http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10730215

      counterproof

      Avatar ★ Merrycatch22 · posted

        I like how you posted on Classified for .66 as counter

        Avatar ★ mcdonalds wet bird · posted

        There appears to be at least one add. Haven't gone on steam yet

        Avatar ★ Merrycatch22 · posted

        COUNTERPROOF


        For L1 and L3:

        Declining 0.66 ref is not enough proof to rid of 0.66 ref in the range. 0.66 is the low end and you can't expect every seller to agree since .77-1 ref is also in the range.


        For L2

        How is unsold at 0.77 ref proof to raise the low end to 0.77?


        For L4

        0.88 ref is in the range.


        For L5:

        The buyer made a mistake and didn't put it as strange. He also made a mistake in his other trade with the jarate: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10314787


        Selling for 0.66 ref:

        http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10730215 4 hrs

        http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10734993 0.66-1 basically means he's willing to sell for 0.66 but will gladly take anything above


        Therefore, it's a Downvote

        Avatar ★ TsaiClone · modified

          For link two, I think it is more of a buffer that stops the price from raising straight to .88


          And by a lot of your logic, you're saying that anytime something is within range, no change is needed

          Avatar ★ JeefBerky · posted

            If it is already within the range, it does nothing to prove a change. A change here would be proved by showing that there are buyer trades for 0.66 ref that are unsuccessful for at least 3 days and there are no sellers at all at 0.66 ref.

            There are TWO current sellers at 0.66 ref.

            Avatar ★ TsaiClone · posted

        Hmm... I'm not too sure about this. Most sellers are selling for 1 ref, INCLUDING the name tag/description tag, and buyers are buying way below this, but they appear to be unsuccessful. Plus, unique stocks for sale aren't very common.


        I don't think the proof is very convincing, so I'm going to downvote.

        Avatar ★ Sugar Abuse · posted

          Comments have shown some unsold at .66, no reason to remove it from the range.

          Also, is there really a need to increase the average price by two cents?

          Avatar ★ An Average NTR Enjoyer · modified