Suggestion: Non-Craftable Concheror at 0.55–0.66 ref

Price Suggestion

~0.22 ref

114 votes up

17 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Sat, 01 Jun 13 06:02:32 +0000 by SirJjjon.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11245216 .55, unsold for at least 7 days (it was relisted http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11153376 )

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11285052

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11272770

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11257359 all .66, all 1 day old+

Irrelevant

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10035439 SET

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10088330 SET

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11306843 "Offers" has none

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10994631 .88

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10359262 1 ref

It's obvious these aren't getting .77 anymore. Small sample size, but it's a noncraft weapon and this is the entirety of outpost.

Comments welcome, as always

You really think it's necessary to drop this by a scrap when the last suggestion, 2 weeks ago, had proof of a sale at 0.77 ref (also 2 weeks ago)? Not criticizing, just wondering what your rationale is there.

^ what he said

unneeded, people selling for low end of a small range shouldn't drop a price right away, and you're basing your proof off 1 outlier

The last suggestion had one successful sale at .77. My proof for .55 is identical in quantity to their proof for .77

The change may be 1 scrap large, but it is more than a 10 percent shift in its price

Understood. Personally, I would have just preferred 0.66 flat to either range. Simpler to trade for 2 recs and may be more accurate (1 sale at 0.55, 1 at 0.77)

Duly noted, but I couldn't find any sales at .66 and another mod suggested a range would be better.

There really aren't that many on outpost, and the ones at 0.77 are definitely unsold. Also, the ones on outpost are 0.66-, or just plain overpriced. 0.77 is definitely saturated.