- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
This is a rather small change, just to keep this price accurate
Less than 1 page of these on outpost.
Sellers at 1 refined:
[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10978007[/url]
[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11107605[/url]
[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10694652[/url] Highest offer is 1 refined, 2 weeks
Sellers at 1.11 refined:
[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11056426[/url]
[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11257366[/url]
Only 1 on the market for 1.22
[url]http://bazaar.tf/trade/215373[/url] 2 weeks old
No buyers.
1.22 is saturated.
Down vote, un needed change, lowering price by .05 with sellers in current range
How is it unneeded? 1.22 is saturated, no sellers on outpost for 1.22. Only one in the whole community, and its 2 weeks old.
Lowering price by .11. And actually only 1 unsold seller in current range. Don't be a Nub.
I think 1 ref flat would be better
Maybe, but 1.22 is for sure not working as of right now. I'm not sure how fast the 1.11 goes for right now, because the links are relatively new for an item with low demand like this.
I'd say 1 ref flat is indeed better.
The 1.11 ref already has been unsold for a week on autobump + Highest offer is 1 ref on the other trade.
Meh, only reason 1.11 is still in range because the second one isn't attended too. Also, unsold isn't valid proof, as stated by Vincent. If there's an abundance of sellers at 1-1.11, we should lower it to there
In this case, I think it's valid.
The 1 ref sales have not been sold as well.