Suggestion: Non-Craftable Backbiter's Billycock at 0.66 ref

Price Suggestion

~10.44 ref

133 votes up

41 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed Tue, 04 Jun 13 06:01:58 +0000 by A Distinctive Lack of Vincent.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

"Hey, since the Backbiter's Billycock is such an amazing and unique hat, why don't we buy an uncraftable version of it for two scrap more than we would usually pay for an average uncraftable hat?" And then, little Timmy was cast into the pit of shame for making such a hasty and unenlightened decision.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11194082 - unsold, wanting 0.88

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11237011 - unsold, wanting 0.88 i think?

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11198085 - unsold, wanting offers, refused 0.66

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11329044 - unsold, wanting 1

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11358935 - unsold, wanting 1

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11351041 - unsold, wanting 1

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11248628 - unsold, wanting 1.33

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11291319 - sold for 0.66

Not much proof because it's not in demand, only 1.5 pages on OP and many are painted.

Have you checked bazaar.tf, we need more proof of sales at 0.66

I have checked bazaar.tf, and we don't need more proof at 0.66, since it's already included in the current range.

Only one indicates 0.66 being sold

It doesn't matter. I could just copy-paste the sales at 0.66 from the last trade and it would still be valid. The only thing I'm doing here is eliminating 0.77-0.88.

You still need proof of sales at 0.66 because that is the suggested price

What don't you understand? The last person included 0.66 in his suggestion, and I'm including it as well, so I don't have to provide proof of sales at 0.66. The previous guy did that for me.

What previous guy? Show proof of it

I don't need to provide proof, because the person before me (http://backpack.tf/vote/id/5135faa1ba2536c42e000019) included it in his suggestion. There is already proof that exists for 0.66.

Right, I did not know that, and most other people wouldn't have either

It's 3 months old!

Doesn't matter, still valid. Besides, my link for one sold at 0.66 helps reconfirm anyway.

3 months ago is not proof

It does not matter. I am not re-confirming 0.66. I am removing 0.77-0.88. I can use the former proof as current proof, seeing as it was already there. If it was already invalid because it was 3 months old, someone would have changed it. If it is still invalid, someone can change it after my suggestion.

After seeing you have 654 points on your profile, I don't know if you're trolling or not but if so, you're really not contributing anything here.

You still need proof of recent trades, not 3 month old trades, it's a total downvote.

Delete all your unsold wanting 1 since it is outside the current range

Eh, still useful since it's one scrap away from 0.88, and people would have offered 0.88 were they willing to pay.

But it is outside, no matter what

"Unsolds are a bad kind of proof" -A Distinctive Lack of Vincent

"Unsolds are the only kind of proof that can be offered in this type of suggestion" - ivor

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11329044 - sold for 1 (your own link)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11341366 - sold for 0.77

Downvote. Unsolds aren't good proof anymore.

Neither of those links are valid. The first one doesn't show anyone commenting to buy it, and none of the ref metal in the seller's backpack is from the current owner. He could have (and probably did) settle for less metal. Same goes for the second link. This is not legitimate counterproof.

"Unsolds aren't good proof anymore" - well, what do you expect me to use as proof?

Ones that got sold, like my links.

If you don't think they are valid I suggest you ask the users.

>ones that got sold

What? At 0.66? 0.66 is already in the range, so I can use the previous suggester's proof at 0.66.

>If you don't think they are valid I suggest you ask the users

Well, you're the one providing the counterproof...

You are criticizing my links, yet the only link that you gave where you are saying that it sold didn't even sold. I suggest you check the history. So the only thing you have are unsolds. And if you read the forums you will notice that unsolds aren't considered as good proof anymore.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8900726 <- There's your sale at 0.66, look at his backpack. And even if my original link didn't sell, clearly someone offered.

Side note, you own 7 of the hat in question.

I suggest YOU check his backpack; he didn't sell it. And if someone offered 0.66 and he rejected that offer that means he's probably looking for more. Again, you don't have any proof besides unsolds.

>I suggest YOU check his backpack; he didn't sell it.

Uh, I never said he sold it; he bought it. There is an uncraftable Backbiter's Billycock in his backpack.

>And if someone offered 0.66 and he rejected that offer that means he's probably looking for more.

So what? That has no impact on this suggestion; it still means that someone offered 0.66.

Unsolds are not valid proof, counterproof provided in comments. Closing.