- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
Shweeep
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11201446 - 2.66
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11273708 - 2.66
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11329984 http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10708838 - offers from 2.66 - 3.33
You need more proof to make this rise, downvote untill someone comes with some good counter proof
You make no sense.
There are loads of these out on the market, a couple trades isn't necessarily indicative of market behavior.
I giggled at that.
So you're trying to rise the price to 2.66. But how do I know that people aren't selling these anymore for 2.33?
Well, if you find any, post the links then, help this guy with his suggestion out. Stand up! Do something! Don't be lazy. Rise and rise again until lambs become lions.
Robin hood?
Steal from the rich and give to the poor.
I scam from the rich to raffle to the poor. Robin hood tf2 style.
Tis is the thug life.
I'm starting to like you santa..
This escalated quickly...
Nah it took a few comments.
I started to like you the moment you started helping me. c:
Oh yeah, I forgot. NO ONE on Outpost ever sells for the lower range.
They're rare.
And like all rare items backpack.tf pussies out trying to give them a price.
I'm raising the price. You should be kissing my feet because your backpack value is increasing. Before you embarrass yourself more I think you should just keep quiet and let me do my thing. #hattersgonnahat
ERMAGHERD MY BACKPACK VALUE INCREASE 2 RECS ULTRA RAISE
Calm down Cheesy G
Sorry to be a terrible person, but:
1st link: 2.66 rejected
2nd link: 2.66 offer, hidden by trade owner
3rd link: 2.66 rejected
4th link: hard to say, the trade owner has hidden high offers.....
So if I were you, I'd delete this suggestion :(
Well, if they all rejected 2.66 offers, sellers are looking for more probably(and buyers are willing at 2.66), that means this price suggestion has a more accurate price then the current price, meaning it should be accepted. Good point door, thanks for supporting!
And bingo was his name o. You have just proved that people want to buy this item for the high end. Sellers aren't the only people that matter.
2.66 is still a closer range...
http://prntscr.com/17zdy9
http://prntscr.com/17zeft
Here's your counter-proofz
Not so fast.
As these might be good counterproofs I have no indication of whether these Sore Eyes are craftable or not.
http://prntscr.com/17zips
http://prntscr.com/17ziys
The first counter proof actually supports this suggestion.
The second is actual counter proof, but still meh
How's it support if your price's 2.66 ?
Just because it be raisin ?
Yerpaderpie c:
You are trying to sell for 3 ref yourself: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11329984
The trades you gave: you bought one for 2.44 one week ago and sold it for 3 ref. You are only supporting the new range with the proof you gave.
Yeah , 1 week ago .
Because just because it's a week old it's instantly dispatched as completely irrelevant.
This ain't no robo hat , this ain't no pair of buds , 1 week's valid here and just because this suggestion's raising the price and I provide a link of a deal where the price is higher than the present one doesn't support this. The suggestion's wrong because I'm showing it's possible for 3 refs and not just 2.66 . You either make an accurate suggestion or an inaccurate. There's nothing in between.
Where did you notice me saying your link was irrelevant? I just said it's 1 week old. Nothing more.
But look at this yourself. You bought for 2.44 and sold dor 3 ref. Meaning the average of those two trades you made is just above 2.66.
Also, if you think the price should be higher, then I suggest you make a suggestion yourself. Nothing changes the fact that this new price is more accurate then the previous one.
Item overpay anyone