Suggestion: The Attendant at 3–3.33 ref

Price Suggestion

~1.44 ref

353 votes up

128 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Wed, 05 Jun 13 16:48:18 +0000 by A Distinctive Lack of Vincent.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

the one that got accepted like 20 hours ago didnt have that good proof. and i will explain why.

proof is copied right from the last suggestion:

Selling less than 3.33

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11382366 (2.66) <- sold in less than a day

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11251617 (2.77, read comments) <- havent been bumped since it was created

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11383149 (3 ref) <- has been added 3 times for attendant

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10973203 (3 ref) <- rejected a clean tossle

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11135631 (3 ref) <- hasnt been bumped for 1½ days and sold (another attendant is in his bp, not the selling one)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11405184 (3 ref) <- has been added once

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11401919 (3 ref) <- has sold

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11376273 (3 ref)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11379671 (3 ref) <- has sold

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11387233 (3 ref) <- has sold

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11219428 (3 ref) <- has been closed because it was inactive for a week

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11404711 (3 ref) <- havent been bumped since it was created

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11334666 (3 ref) <- sold

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11172235 (3 ref when in stock) <- has sold/none in stock

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11408654 (3.11) <- has sold

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11388789 (3.11)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11278819 (3.11) <- hasnt been bumped for 1½ days

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11409994 (3.11 + wep) <- has sold

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11263006 (3.22) <- rudely rejected clean tossle

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11392724 (3.22) <- has sold

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11190011 (3.22) <- hasnt been bumped for 2 days

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11221341 (3.22) <- was closed because it was inactive for a week

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11373146 (3.22) <- hasnt been bumped since it was created

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11401348 (3.22) <- hasnt been bumped since it was created

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11386412 (3.22) <- hasnt been bumped for 1½ days

Unsold at 3.33

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10873424 (2 weeks) <- has sold

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11061484 (1 week) <- very rarely bumps his posts (basing that of the fact that he has recent trades closed because they arent bumped for 1 week

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11095482 (1 week) <- has offer of clean tossle, 3,11 ref and 3,22 ref

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11219411 (6 days) <- was closed for being inactive for a week

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11261672 (4 days) <- hasnt been bumped since it was created

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11285564 (3 days) <- sold

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11312225 (2 days) <- hasnt been bumped since it was created

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11359878 (1 day)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11372386 (1 day) <- hasnt been bumped since it was created

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11369509 (1 day) <- hasnt been bumped since it was created

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11377235 (1 day)

so seeing this im wondering 2 things. why was this accepted? most of the proof was for unbumped trades, and assuming ALL trades were still running when the suggestion was passed, 95% of the trades have sold or are unbumped. whoever accepted that past suggestion, did you even look at the links before you accepted it? or just took his word without looking?

also, this was provided in the comments in the last suggestion: http://imgur.com/eWrX0xi

and i just sold mine for this: http://puu.sh/37Q3v.png

this shows that 3 ref moves in like a day at the highest, and that 3.33 is still very possible. even the trades in the middle has sold for their listed price.

3-3.33 is still the price. not a flat 3

Thank you, someone who analyses proof, and doesn't just overlook it.

People sometimes just look at lots of trades, and blindly upvote.

Before backpack.tf actually made admins/users look for the item sales themselves, therefore allowing them to see what's really going on. Now they just upvote whether there's 10 links or 40.

I don't know how you could possibly assume that my proof was copied from the previous suggestion when he was raised the price and I lowered it. None of the links were the same and it was 2 months ago! That statement is false and I suggest you remove it from your suggestion.

Christley </3 Peelz means that above is the proof that you presented in your suggestion, which is actually the "previous" suggestion. May be a little confusing at first, but read it over and then you'll understand.

At a glance your proof looks solid, but many of them sold quickly, and 3.33 ones sold too, with success still.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11428779

Worth noting, I got added and sold the attendant in a minute. 3 ref goes quick.

I think a big part of the last suggestion being accepted was the overwhelming amount of upvotes (86%) from people (most, not all) who probably only glanced at the proof and blindly voted. Also, it may have been accepted due to the numerous sellers at 3 ref. I'm not completely sure about which price is better because naturally there has to be sales above and below the range, and I'm not sure if 3.33 ref happens as often as 3 ref.

of course the 3 ref happens more often than 3.33, its cheaper and thats why there is a range. 3 moves faster while 3.33 may take some time but its sure possible.

What I meant was if there were more 3 ref sellers than 3.33 ref buyers.

If not many people are willing to sell for 3 ref, then 3 ref flat would not be appropriate, and there would be more buyers at 3.33 ref.

upvote, good job!

3.33 still happens.

GG, Admins.