Price Suggestion
The Anger
Submitted by pappa pasi luukkonen
~2.94 ref
Unique Anger
372 votes up
306 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed by Elsa Payaso.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Price needs updating. It's 4 weeks old.

Few sellers who sell it for 3 ref or more:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10937062

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8503254

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11379859

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11444427

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11438328

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9527500

NOTICE:And there's only few seller who sell it for 3 ref or more. And my anger is genuine, not clean


    I sell it for 1 earbuds

      Bro that's lowballing you're gonna get sharked! I sell mine for 3 buds!

        But a guy offerd me 1 bud.. its mean the price is 1 bud

      You Anger is genuine not clean? By the way need buyers not sellers.

        You are removing 2.66. You must show us its not possible to buy at 2.66 at all.

        Well that's new...same suggestion twice...at the same time.

          You need to show buyers not sellers.

          Selling is not equal to sold

            I'm selling it for 2.66 ref even painted. Counterproof: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11445742


            By the way, you should show us some proof about being impossible to buy it for 2.66 ref if you delete it from the range.

              You need to find evidence of buyers too.

                Bought for 2 ref: http://i.imgur.com/7HfDI4i.png

                Selling for 3 ref. http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11443439

                I don't know because I'm a quickbuyer and this might just be an outlier.

                  your link 1 is painted.

                  your link 2 has been in-active for 3 months.

                  you have to show proof of buyers at 3 ref and that 2.66 is not possible.

                    Second link hasn't been inactive for 3 months, there are posts hidden by trade owner a week ago.

                    Why need too much time this sugestion? well easy downvote

                        I'm sorry, there is not enough evidence to support your suggestion.