- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
Time to move this thing up. The crate is pretty old and people pay plenty for this. Someone gave me a strange shortstop with defenders killed and scouts killed a long time ago, so I don't have proof for that, but here are some links from tf2outpost:
My trade, sold for .66:
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11476452
Denied .33:
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11115173
Denied .33:
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11426081
Asks .66 for flamethrower:
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11331688
Selling flamethrower for .44:
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11450767
Selling for .66:
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11478939
Selling for one ref:
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10664306
I hope that's enough proof but you really have to understand this is actually in demand, and if quick-fix went from .33 to .33-1 ref then I think turning this into .33-.66 is more than fair.
neeed moar
your proof is mediocre at best. One sale at .66, the rest is useless. (not that I get why it's so low, it's a pretty decent weap)
s DEGREASER :D
but degreaser kills nothing, and is unnecessary if you know how to airblast
it can put out fires, airblast rockets, and kill posthumously (popular parts that need a strange to ride on)
It's primarily for reflects and extinguishes and other such parts.
The only proof is the one you sold. The rest proves they're not selling. Thanks, I guess.
Need moar proof for .66
I think .44 is a more realistic price for it. See if you can gather some evidence for that. To be honest, one sale at .66 is not enough proof. For example, how do we know that that person wasn't a friend? You need a lot more proof for that to be passed. Items selling doesn't really count as proof. I could sell Winter Holiday Noise Makers at a bud but that doesn't reflect on their actual value. If you open another suggestion with solid evidence of .44 then I would be happy to up vote. Unfortunately I am going to have to down vote this as there isn't any sufficient evidence. Another problem is that there a lot of strange dealers who buy for at under price, sometimes as low as half the price and below. Then they go and sell their little success for profit. This can be a bad example for the price. For example: Strange dealer X buys a S. Sniper Rifle of a newly premium player who has discovered opening crates. X buys this for .66 (price being 1 - 1.33). Then X goes and sells this weapon for 1.44 or even 1.55. This doesn't mean that the price of the S. Sniper Rifle is .66 or even 1.44-55 it just means that it is bad proof. Hope this helps!
I agree that people buy at .44. I was offered .44 for one but unfortunately the person did not notice the parts. Downvote for now due to the lacking proof.
Very, very lacking proof.
Downvote.
On it's way up, yes, but not enough to do a price suggestion yet. I say a S. Stickybomb Launcher sold for 1 ref recently and I couldn't make a suggestion cuz people were still selling for 0.33 in these classfields. I feel sorry for that moron...
Unslod for 0.33 http://backpack.tf/classifieds/search/208/11/0
Unsold*
Also, i see a flamethrower with the cloaked spies and engineers killed for 1.33 as lowest!
Anyways back to the discussion, bring us more evidence of the trades.
Yeah there were only 2 for 0.33, now there's another one http://puu.sh/39Pzw.png
But onsold doesn't mean much here since it's the current price. I meant to say Selling instead of Unsold.
Your proof is very lacking. The selling owners need proof of actual sales first, until they do, the links are useless and counterproductive to what you are trying to show.
The price should probably go up, but you need to have more links of sales actually happening.
There are 20 pgs on OP so you would need MUCH MORE proof than that. You are doubling the original price as the high-end, which is pretty substantial. A couple sold for 0.66 ref would only be outliers.
There are too many available at 0.33 ref to make it the low-end.
Counterproof:
Selling for 0.33 ref
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8403575 (x5)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10690610
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11345237 (x6)
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11409831
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11412929
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11426273
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11472487
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11504821
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11505992
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11505998
Unsold for 0.55 ref
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11022426 2 weeks
Unsold for 0.66 ref
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8905536 3 months
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10745396 3 weeks
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10876009 2 weeks
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11219172 1 week
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11400536 3 days
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11403574 3 days (10 views)
paid .33 for mine a few days ago and was researching then .44 was the majority and few above and at .33 was a good deal QK 2 cents /downvote
http://puu.sh/39T1B.png
http://puu.sh/39T2n.png
Downvote
Selling =/= sold
Downvote.
You shouldn't raise the price because you got rejected for a perfectly good offer from some faggot on outpost.
crate isnt old lol
Counterproof in comments. One lucky sale at .66 isn't enough when there are many failing to sell at .66, and some even failing to sell at .33