Suggestion: Genuine Ham Shank at 1.33–1.66 ref

Price Suggestion

~14.39 ref

155 votes up

46 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Sat, 08 Jun 13 19:47:50 +0000 by An Average NTR Enjoyer.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Proof:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11452768 unsold at 1.33 refined for 3 days

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11482042 unsold at 1.33 refined for 2 days

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11484444 unsold at 1.33 refined for 2 days

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11485250 unsold at 1.33 refined for 2 days

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11500503 unsold at 1.33 refined for 1 day

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11522143 unsold at 1.33 refined

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11537281 unsold at 1.33 refined

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11539841 unsold at 1.33 refined

1.66 is still a viable option but 1.33 is definitely becoming more prevalent.

Upvote ;)

I hate to say this, but PUT IN SOME EFFORT!

Michael Puddington put the proof on the other suggestion and you just copy and paste????

Unacceptable.

Staying Neutral because of this

So you want all the market to have outdated prices

just because he copy paste? -_-

Who care if he dont put effort ... the price he suggest is right . There is proof and thats it.

I just don't like it. I had a very sad experience about this. I actually hate when people do it, even though if they have a more accurate price.

e.g. http://backpack.tf/vote/id/517b2052ba25366d45000007

and http://backpack.tf/vote/id/517b2fb84bd7b81f39000022

Well yes he could ask you if he can resuggest for 1.33 flat before, but i see in comments that you wouldnt do it

Also if it got accepted its mean his range was better and again we cant set wrong prices just because he copied your proof

Cya :P

It would be a lot better if Creestab had credited the proof to Puddington, imo.

Sorry about that. Puddington did do the original proofs, but i did add and elaborate onto them below. Plus to all of you who are abstaining just for the sheer fact its copypasta, if Pudding wanted full credit he would have started a suggestion himself. Me sourcing him is better than no update at all. Now vote regardless of where the proof came from; proof is proof.

I agree that does seem annoying, but the difference here is this:

1)The range suggested is different.

2)This suggestion was not a copy of another one, but a sourced comment.

A few are now sold, here are some 1.66s just to prove the upper section

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11433943 sold

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11557752 new

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11531497 new

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11517374 new

Very little unsolds because THEY ARE SELLING, all unsolds i could find are new.

So people are selling for 1.33 & 1.66, hence the price update

Can't sold the mine for 1.66, and even at 1.55. Finally succesful sold at 1.33, approved.

But still no vote for me, because the range is too strange with your counterproofs (many unsold, even at 1.33) ...