Price Suggestion
Strange Scattergun
Submitted by Nobody_Home
~28 ref
Strange Scattergun
101 votes up
29 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted by Elsa Payaso.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

a scattergun suggestion with proof...


My proof,


sold for a craft hat

http://i.imgur.com/TXR0G4F.png?1


sold for 1.55

http://i.imgur.com/lx3vuCi.png?1


bought for 1 ref

http://i.imgur.com/K2MAfK7.png?1

http://i.imgur.com/7E9i1Kk.png?1


Outpost

offer of a surgeon's stalhelm

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11282354


has an add at 1.66 (i think)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11438338


many buyer at 1 ref, 1.33 and a buyer at 1.66

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8343094


has an offer of 1.22 for scattergun

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10667874


many adds at 1 ref

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11582948


an add 1.66 and a craft hat offer

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10838282


adds at 1 ref

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/9527596


1.33 offer for scattergun

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11499516


out of scatterguns

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11003334


offer of 1 ref

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11607911


has an add at 1 ref


buying for 1 ref

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11656064


was buying at 1 ref

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/8092751


http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11573685


http://backpack.tf/classifieds/search/scattergun

only 2 at 1 ref, one is 4 days old the other one is sold (i added him)


Not many at 1.66 and people still sell them at 1 ref so 1-1.33 it is. If i made any mistakes just post below and i will do my best to fix them.

    Could you organize your proof better in the future?

    Also, you only have two links confirming 1.33. Given the 20+ pages on Outpost, I think you could do better.

      As you are increasing/making the high-end. i dont see the point why you show us 1ref sells/buys.

        http://i.imgur.com/lhiRa0C.png?1 Sold one for a craft hat. It's a bit old though, but as long as it was after previous suggestion, it's something, right?

        Gonna stay neutral for now, I'll wait for more proof.