Suggestion: Triboniophorus Tyrannus at 1.66–1.77 ref

Price Suggestion

~1.55 ref

114 votes up

69 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed Thu, 13 Jun 13 18:32:50 +0000 by the submitter.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Proof:

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11682726 (got 50+ of these and sells for 1.66 )

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11647549 (Unsold 1.66)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11683370 (Sells for 1.33!)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11680035 (Sells for 1.66 and got more than one)

Seriously.

Better than the other one, but with eight pages on Outpost I think you can do better.

Obvious downvote

Your price means 1.88 never happens and 1.77 still happens, you showed none of it and all you got is 4 links which are showing 1.66 is very possible and simple and there are 9 pages of this hat so yeah, downvote

1.88 and 1.77 never happens because it's considered too expensive for this item. Take your suggestion, 1.66-2 Refined does not mean 1.66 or 2 Refined, it means from 1.66 to 2 Refined.

Your comment is meaningless because when it's a scrap difference there's not exactly a range but 2 prices, and when you want to make it 1.66 - 1.77 instead of 1.66 - 1.88 you need to show 1.66 - 1.77 works but 1.88 doesn't work and he didn't do that, AT ALL

If 1.88 doesn't happen, then how in the world do you expect 2 Refined to happen?

Plus, he doesn't need to prove 1.88 happens if it not in his range, he need to disprove it, which is something you yourself failed to do on your suggestion.

I'm just saying what's already been said to you on your suggestion: If a set price does not happen for sellers, then odds are you need to drop the price, not raise it.

WTF are you talking about?!

Do you even understand English?

Disapproving 1.88 and proving it doesn't happen is the exact same thing

When he shows 4 sellers of 1.66 when there are 9 pages it doesn't reflect the market at all

And if he removed ONLY 1.88 from range and keeps 1.77 in it, it means 1.77 still happens and all his 4 links aren't related to 1.77

By the way the ImpossibleD is saying pretty much the exact same thing as I am

Forgive me, I'm a little distraught from juggling a part-time job, writing lessons, the UGC tournaments, and my day-to-day life.

*Clears throat* At least he bothered to find some proof.

You don't need to prove 1.77 if it's already in range.

Allow me to lay this matter to rest before this escalates.

Show unsuccessful sellers at 1.88 refined, please.

That is what is required to remove the high end of a range.

Srsly? Not as worst as the other one but where are the trades for 1.77 and the unsolds for 1.88. And btw, there is a mistake in Link 2. Better fix it.

I have sold a level 1 for 2.22

Special level, though.

You're not showing any proof of why 1.77 would be better than 1.88. Saying some sold for 1.66 is in the current range, and isn't helping you with this... Downvote, sorry.