Suggestion: Genuine Flying Guillotine at 2 ref

This item just does not move. 2.33 refined is impossible to achieve, and 2.00 refined even seems hard to do as well. With the amount of unsolds for 2.33 refined it isn't needed in the range. Many of these are readily available for 2.00 refined on outpost, and even cheaper at classifieds for 1.66 refined. I am suggesting a flat price of 2.00 refined to play it safe for now, but this item is becoming available for cheaper and should be re-evaluated in the coming weeks because of this.

In your unsold link the cleaver was level one. If you read his description he says that since the level is 1 he's "excepting a bit more". And in your second unsold link, if you look in the offers, many people want to buy the cleaver, idk why he still hasn't sold it yet. all of your unsolds 4 days can be neglected because take in mind that genuines take longer to sell.

Alright, but there's an unsold for 1.66 that's 3 days old in classifieds and I've been bumping mine at that price for about as long too (http://imgur.com/7a02uv9). I don't believe there is any such rule about genuines. If there was, the Awper Hand, Anger, etc suggestions that we've seen lately shouldn't have been accepted. I am confident that this price better represents the market then the range does, since they are readily available at 2.00 and below and the 2.33 ones do not move.

if you're going to acknowledge the 1.66 unsold in the classifieds then should the range be 1.33 or something. Then it's neither the current price or your suggested price. Cause why pay more?

I don't know why you're suggesting 1.33 should be in the range when 1.66 is the lowest price out there. Those two are quicksells, including mine. The evidence is insufficient for that price, like I suggested in my proof if you would have actually taken the time to read through it. If you disagree with my suggestion, you are welcome to downvote it. I'm not going to argue with your broken logic.

If you couldn't tell I was making fun of your broken logic, I was saying that by acknowledging the 1.66 as an unsold you're suggesting that it should be 1.33 or something. And now you're calling them quicksells. You went from calling them unsolds to quicksells. And I've had read through your proof, so if there's anybody with broken logic it's you.

As mentioned before, you are more then welcome to use your vote if you disagree. I'm not going to get into a petty argument when the proof is in my favor. The prices on this website are meant as a guide and it is impossible to cover every single sale with just one price. I feel that the proof represents that the price I am suggesting is better and more accurate then the one this website reflects.

"you are more then welcome to use your vote if you disagree"

In actuality I'm staying neutral

"I'm not going to get over a petty argument when the proof is in my favor"

I wasn't arguing about your proof, I was arguing about your broken logic and why you think my logic is broken.

"The prices on this website are meant as a guide and it is impossible to cover every single sale with just one price"

Dude, I have as many suggestions as you do, I know what this site is.

" I feel that the proof"

.......

I'm going to ignore any replies after this

Oh and thanks for disliking my comments :)

I disliked exactly one of your comments: http://imgur.com/AFcXHDe . I'm sorry other people that use this website realize you're acting like an ass, despite being completely unprovoked, all over a website that is pricing a virtual weapon in a game.