Suggestion: Vintage Stainless Pot at 4.66–5 ref

This vintage pot has almost no demand at outpost, and i found out big difference between sellers, a lot of sellers for 1 key (unsold of course), few sellers for 5-5.33 ref (unsold also) and the rest of sellers at 5 and lower. I believe it's time for this soldier hat to go down a bit.

The only proof of a sale you have is in the unsold section and was sold for a key.

No sales at 5 ref, so why is it still in the range?

There are no sales at all from the proof he has given in the sellers at 5 ref section.

When lowering range, lower B/O is enough. if someone want 5 ref for the pot that worth 5.33 by backpack.tf it's clear that the price should drop. Actual sales needed only when you want higher price, so you need to prove that it sold for that price. When lowering range you need to prove that people selling it for less then market price, and if they still unsold at 5 ref, maybe the price should be even lower, if that's what you mean. By the way, someone added seller for 5 ref if that matters, almost sale, maybe he bought another one. For example, take a look at previous suggestion i made, about the fan o'war, and it passed . I showed that people selling in for lower then the bp.tf price, and that they can't sell for higher and that was enough, admin accepted this.

What I'm saying is that the range should be lower, given your evidence. Why keep 5 ref when you've shown that it doesn't happen because there are sellers at 4.66? And please don't belch out anymore tl;dr stuff.

Well the range can't be lower.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12388213

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12098327

As you can see there are buyers around 4.66.

The only sale on your proof list is in the unsold section and was sold for a key. And surely people selling at 5 ref doesn't prove your range as there are no sales meaning the price should be lower if nobody is willing to buy at 5 ref even.

You can't read or what ?

The price can't stay the same because people can't sell if for 5-5.33 or a key.

The price can't be lower then what i suggesting because It will be easy to bring a counter proof, that i provided myself 2 comments up there.

I already said this, so ur comment is really pointless, especially that i made 4 suggestion in this way, with unsolds at current price and sellers at lower price, all my suggestions accepted by admins, so i believe my way is pretty ok. Also, I agree that ONE pot has been sold for a key, but that's one of very few that sold at current range, we all agree that new range is needed.

In your first block of proof, you show many unsolds at 5 ref and one seller at 4.66 ref. No actual sales at 5 ref, so why is it still in the range?

Your second block of proof is just link spam. 9 of the links are sellers at 1 key (nothing to do with the range). The other 4 include 3 selling at 5.33 and 1 selling at 5.22. Decent proof, but you can't just rely on unsolds. Also, 2 of your 1 key pots are now sold (these are the only successful sales that I'm seeing).

Overall, I don't think this suggestion is very good, frankly, so I'm still downvoting.

your link 1 got an offer of a v. panama + 2 rec -- 5.33.

you need more proof of sales at 4.66.

Wrong sir, if you calculate items overpay it should be around 5 ref, not more then that. about the sales, I answered 1 comment below.

even so you don't have much proof for the lower end.

edit: read the comment below, the buyers who buy for 4.66 are quickbuyers, shouldn't be used as proof.

I don't think I need sales at 4.66, it doesn't matter, I already proved that my range is the best. We all agree that current range is bad. We all agree that price should drop. The only question left is how much should the pot drop. But, the price can't be lower then what i suggest because I provided buyers at 4.66, what means that if there are sellers at 5 ref, and buyers at 4.66, and no other options to provide solds at 4.66, clearly this is the range that will fit this item, no need at solds. About the buyers, wrong again. http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12267321 , this is quickbuyer, for example. the buyer i brought didn't said he is quick-buying and he doesn't look like quickbuyer. the guy with panama isn't a quickbuyer neither.

of course you need actual sales at 4.66 or atleast more sellers at 4.66 otherwise your range is in-accurate. http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12388213 -- quickbuyer at 4.66.

Need proof on successful sale for 4.66 refs .I see only sell and unsold -it not good proof .

Well we all agree that the current price is too much high. I provided plenty of proof for that. I can't suggest lower range then what i suggest because it will be easy to bring counter-proof. There are buyers around 4.66 (you can find the link few comments up there). So if sellers sell for 5 ref, and buyers buy at 4.66, this range should fit the item. If the sellers went below market price clearly that the price should drop. But a huge drop, even more then what i suggest won't be good.

For all those who are looking for actual sale (even i think its not "must" for this suggestion) :

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12311721

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11359835 (yes i know it's old but he sold it when price was 1 key)

So now we got a problem, we got sale for 4-4.11, but i can't suggest a range around that as it's too much low and i already showed buyers at higher prices.

As in the comments, a single trade at 4.66 ref isn't enough to include it in range.

Closing for insufficient evidence of low range.