- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
This thing is going down and down!
If proofs this is sufficient enough.
Selling for 1.66:
[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12369948[/url] - Again, Yes, This is my trade and the current offer is 1.66
[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12417071[/url]
[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12505830[/url] - Got many and only sold 1 atm
[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12498996[/url]
[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12489176[/url] - Wants a S.SMG which is worth 1.33 - 2 Refs average is 1.66 (of course, I know you know math)
Selling for 1.88:
[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12512907[/url]
[url]http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12509343[/url]
I've seen unsolds at 2 Refs but I'm too bored to put it here.
gimme unsolds for 2 ref :) not enought proof for me couse i added alot of people who was selling for 2 ref and almost all of them was sold check sellers bp too
Isn't that the reason why he suggested 1.66-2, and not just 1.66 flat?
You need to show it is hard to sell at 2 ref, not impossible, but hard.
2 ref is already in the range-does he really have to put in proof of 2 ref being hard to sell at-wouldn't that already be proof for eliminating 2 ref from the range?
Don't you only need to prove(for suggesting a low end to the current price range) that people are able to buy it for lower than the current price range and that people sell it for lower than the current price range and that it isn't a quicksell?
Sorry, if it sounds dumb, but I'm asking because I, too, don't know...
Well, he is showing that most people value it below 2 ref, putting the low end of 1.66, and it would really back up his suggestion showing that it is hard to sell for 2 ref. It's not absolutely necessary, but It would certainly get more positive votes on your side.
Oh, thanks for explanation-this certainly will help me on my further suggestions :)
No problem. :)