Price Suggestion
~1.39 ref
Unique A Rather Festive Tree
557 votes up
459 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was closed by A Distinctive Lack of Vincent.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Proof

http://backpack.tf/classifieds/search/341/6/0 only 4


http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12502415 I sold for 2 ref on july 10th, trade only open for a day


EM3RALD_L3GION: hi

Madhouse # 尼玛菌: hi

Madhouse # 尼玛菌: 1.66ok?

EM3RALD_L3GION: for

The trade request was cancelled.

Madhouse # 尼玛菌: 2ref

You have accepted the trade request from Madhouse # 尼玛菌.

EM3RALD_L3GION: for what

Madhouse # 尼玛菌: ?

EM3RALD_L3GION: what item is it?

EM3RALD_L3GION: that you want

You have accepted the trade request from Madhouse # 尼玛菌.

Madhouse # 尼玛菌: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12502415

EM3RALD_L3GION: ok

Madhouse # 尼玛菌 has accepted your request to to trade.

Madhouse # 尼玛菌: ?

You have accepted the trade request from Madhouse # 尼玛菌.

Madhouse # 尼玛菌: ok

Madhouse # 尼玛菌: bay


http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11978936 an item offer of 1.66

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12179898 willing to pay the 1.66 then retracted i guess. + an offer of 1.33

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10984199 1.66 offer

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11615629 gold painted chicken hat (1.33 hat painted 2.33 - 3 ref paint)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12397654 traded the tree (1.66?)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11849827 sold for 1.66

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12206399 sold at 1.66

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12478561 denied an offer of 1.44

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11568882 denied offer of 1.44

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12254877 denied offer of 1.44


    1.33 still happens, as counter-proven here and with much more proof available. Sorry, but I'll have to downvote. The range is currently appropriate since both the low-end and high-end occur

        http://backpack.tf/classifieds/search/341/6/0 has a seller at 1.55.

        current range is fine.

          Closing due to counterproof in comments