- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12674848
Recently unboxed one, with a B/O of 4 and 2 keys, and while that doesn't matter much, it SEEMS that somebody is prepared to buy it for a similar price. That's just a fresh unbox though.
Next one has an offer of a Terror Watt Yellow Belt (W/ offers of Bubbles Bomber + Vivid Outdoorsman on the Belt) http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12570106 , Which rounds out to 4.1~ or so. The sulph slug offer seems to have either been retracted, or somebody got to the original owner first. Most likely retracted, considering how early the post was.
http://imgur.com/MqhgZuX Here's a link to an image of my conversation with the original owner of the second listed Aces High Napper's Respite, which, he says, he traded the Napper's+TS Bill's for a Sulph Pith Helm. Don't know where that's in his bp, but whatever, quote from the guy proving sale, ask him yourself, yadda yadda. Anyways, Sulph Pith Helm seems to have been sold for 3 pure, http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11867727 from another person, and the current owner of one has offers of 3 and an offer of a TW Robo Glove( http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12314496) and here's a list of offers for the robo glove (http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12657839) . So, rounds out to 3-4 for the pith, and since the original owner of the Napper's had to add to his own hat with a TS Bills, which is about .3 in active market, makes the lowend of this hat reach 3.6. Anyways, from the offers of multiple new effects, this is what I have to prove the price of this hat.
Uh... Napper + Bills for an unusual which sold for 3 buds yet you price the Napper at 3.6 minimum? You:re saying that that one sale was an outlier or what? You took the high value of YOUR suggested range for the pith to get the low end which I feel is simply... wrong. :/ Would make sense to value the pith at 3 and thus 2.7 as the low end and 4 - .3 doesn:t equal 3.6..... So yeah.
The reason I priced the Napper's at 3.6, was because I priced the sulph pith at 3 TO 4. I believe the one sell of the sulph pith at 3 was a quicksell, which can't be used to prove much, but remove 3 from the range.
Kinda hard to proof that 3 was a quicksell especially as you said the others had similar offers of 3 buds, one would argue its not a quick-sell and then youre just taking the highest price thus making it inaccurate? At least take a mid suggested price or something, I still feel a 3.6 low end is very high.
Ugh, it can be fixed at a later point in time, this is why the system is here no? I'm just trying to set a maximum high end for this hat.
I understand but currently its like you:re setting a maximum LOW end for this hat. Regardless, GL, going to have to downvote for now, but that:s just me.
Sorry and I wish you the best of luck regardless of what you do.
Thanks, well, it's probably the best I can do for now, as, 3-4.1 would just be a bit too large of a range to really work all that well.
So..much...text...
Upvote.
Much text =/= solid proof ..
link one did not sell for b/o. "I get punai" mentioned that he would add the owner to discuss "umut's" offer. Umut offered to I get punai
http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12155422
sold for spec spec v bills.
Please, please use common sense and actually read and comprehend what was written instead of assuming.