Suggestion: Non-Craftable Outdoorsman at 2 ref

Price Suggestion

Non-Craftable Outdoorsman

Submitted Wed, 17 Jul 13 23:28:07 +0000 by ★ Seraph

87.69%

2–3 ref

2 ref

~19 ref

171 votes up

24 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Sat, 20 Jul 13 06:14:19 +0000 by SirJjjon.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

What kind of range is this!?

http://www.tf2outpost.com/search/132484375 Only a few on OP.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12765739 Selling for 2 ref

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12723976 Selling for 2 ref

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12810111 Unsold for 3 ref (the guy keeps closing and reopening hat-selling trades if he's sold a few of them. It's hard to gauge how long it's been unsold, but he made a trade with that hat 4 hours ago, so let's just say a young trade)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12785437 Unsold for 3 ref (young trade)

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12039911 Unsold for 2 craftable outdoorsman (2.66)

Also, this: http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12318931 Sold for 2 ref

So there you have it. 6 relevant trades on Outpost, 3 of them selling/sold for the lowest of the range, the other 3 unsold for higher in the range. As for the unsolds, they're a bit too young to be great proof (except for the one selling for 2 craftable outdoorsman, that one's weeks old), so we'll watch them as the suggestion goes on.

~~inb4 "Soma, stob making useless UC suggestions and go back to lowering the escape plan"~~

As far as it looks on the proof side, I agree that it should be lower. However, it should be more conservative than just flat out 2 refined. My reason is that, though they have 3 unsolds at 3 ref and at 2.66( though that could be controversial, as he might have sold it were it actually for metal). This leaves a range from (possibly) 2 ref to 2.66 ref, as you have no proof that it was unsold at 2.33 ref.

I agree with you.

Logic haz too much logic.

I win haiku war.

Dam it chigga, you

The war ended with price change

I still won it boy.

But there's no evidence of any sellers or sales at 2.33 ref, why should it be in the range? Also, I don't see how 2.66 fits in here, all we have is one unsuccessful seller with weird selling conditions (2 of the same craft hat).

Oh whoops, incorrect format

Your logic is poor

Why would I put those in the range

I don't understand...

Well, as stated before, you have no proof that it was unsold at 2.33, and i agree the 2.66 is a little weird, so I'll say to 2.55. All we know for sure is that it's getting sold at 2 ref and unsold at 3 ref, with a weird case at 2.66.

Your range is too small

Range states price payed for item

Conservative drop...

"All we know for sure is that it's getting sold at 2 ref and unsold at 3 ref"

You just proved my point

No sales are above two ref

That's why the drop's there.

All i'm saying is that seems a little extreme of a price change.

There's no Haiku war

Please stop writing in Haikus

I hate these Haikus