Suggestion: Strange Rust Botkiller Flame Thrower Mk.I at 1–1.22 ref

Price Suggestion

~4.44 ref

138 votes up

108 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Tue, 23 Jul 13 21:46:04 +0000 by Horizon.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Has not been updated for 1 month and there aren't too many default (no strange parts) of these really in circulation. having sold mine for 2.33 ref today instantly, I pulled out as many as I could. Also if someone could tell me how to find hidden items (deleted ones after being sold), it would be greatly appreciated. Also I would really care less about making 0.22 ref if that is what you think I am trying to do. Just check my backpack worth and don't give me that shit. I am trying to help update a price.

You can sell this botkiller for 1 ref each

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11920492

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12223775

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12472964

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10569629

Buying for 1.11 ref

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12512256

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10194728 - was buying but bought enough?

Sold for 1.22 ref

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/11522332 - guy was added

Sold for 2.33 ref

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12909071

Well... the 1 ref is already shown to be possible, because the current price range allows it...

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12512256 is actually not really known at what price it was sold at....

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/10194728 this is3 months old, and therefore part of an older range

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12909071-Da fuq? he sold a flamethrower at 2.33 ref, I really doubt someone bought it for that much; maybe a friend? or an alt acct? really, I'l call that an extreme outlier

He said in the description buying "any strange botkiller" and in the right is that botkiller

notice how this price range of 1 ref is 5 months old and that the trade stopped autobumping 4 days ago

It is an extreme outlier. Therefore it isn't included in the range :/

If it's not in the range, then why did you post your own sale? xD

2.33 is higher then 1.22 right? Therefor I count it as the 1.22 range since it was an outlier if that makes any sense.

Well, showing your own sale can mean a lot of things; and well.. if you were able to sell a key to someone who was stupid enough (hypothetically) for a bills, then would the price for a key rise slightly because of it?

lol. last link is you. if you look at the item history, it is STILL IN your backpack...

also, the 1.11 buyer who "bought enough" is a 3 month old trade.

"sold" for 1.22, the item history shows still in his backpack.

in case you don't know, people that sell botkillers generally hold more then 1. I had 3 in my backpack, go check my backpack history.

This price range of 1 ref suggested by backpack.tf is 5 months old and that trade with 1.11 stopped auto bumping 4 days ago.

Same thing as my first comment.

Your theory is illogical.

I can give away those two if I wanted to, have you perhaps looked at my backpack worth? Do you really think a price range increase from 1 ref to 1-1.22 ref means anything to me but prestige if the price gets accepted...

It wasn't sold for 2.33, he just marked this as done, but he still own this.

Would you go an check the backpack history? 3 turns into 2.

I would like to have a screenshot of the trade history and prove that you actually sold it for 2.33. The majority, as other comments said, highly doubt you did.

deal, I will post it

http://postimg.org/image/jhn134aat/

I don't think this new range is necessary. First of all, prices in this site goes by rec (0.33), not by scrap. So your your range is problematic, when all other prices here goes with difference of 0.33 in range. Second, there is no really need to change the item's price in only 2 scrap, especially when you have only 3 links of proof. I think you should re-suggest with 1-1.33 range, or just let it stay 1 ref flat.

http://backpack.tf/vote/id/513d34a24bd7b8b735000003

Whoever said prices MUST be by reclaimed increments?

OK, so not ALL other prices goes by rec, but we both know that most of them goes like that.

People complain about the 2.33 ref deal while it has hardly anything to do with the suggestion.

With so many buyers at 1 ref, a flat price becomes inappropirate.