- Forums
-
Pricing
- Community Pricing
- Pricegrid
- Spreadsheet
- Browse Suggestions
- Latest Changes
- Unusual Pricelist
- Browse by Item
- Browse by Effect
- Steam Community Market
- Market Pricelist
-
Trading
- Classifieds
- Classified Listings
- Utilities
- Calculator
- Premium Search
- Statistics
Just sold mine for Steaming Noble amassement of hats + Steaming Dragonborn helmet, those are priced 15-22 keys and 1.3 - 1.6 buds.
I provide pic of the trade:
http://i44.tinypic.com/qxp9qr.png
And you can see them on my backpack: http://backpack.tf/profiles/76561198070764394
That matches with a previous suggestion on price, some time ago.
I think this is a fair price for this cancer but high effect hat for heavy.
this isn't the only sale, there are at least 3 more, there are 2 copies of thie unusual and both are on outpost
The only one more in the outpost and in the world was quicksold, and now is still looking for a home
I just noticed you left your post at outpost open, that's why there were 2 trades
I realized too and just closed it fast, sorry :P
anyway, if there's only 1 known sale, why make it a ranged price?
Steaming Noble is 1.5*0.9=1,4
Steaming Dragonborn is 19 keys*0.9= 17 keys
that's a total flat price of 2.2
I'd suggest closing this and resuggesting as 2.2 flat
when making unusual suggestions, the value of unusual for unusual is mid price * 0.9, you don't take the range and put it there
I suggested a ranged price because the 2 unusuals are ranged price too, and just did the maths for them as a ranged price for the pack.
2,2 is rather the middle price, 1,9 + 0.3 - 2.6 - 0.3
I think is kinda better on ranged for now unless its sold for an exact quantity on pure
Anyway im ok too with a 2.2 price if this does not go through
2.2 buds flat is a horrible idea since the trade involved selling two other unusuals and that means you're assuming the price of the other unusuals is correct which most of the time they aren't. A range is better when an unusual is sold for multiple unusuals though I do not agree with this one.
the range might be a little large.
I think when suggesting in a 2:1 unusual, both with range price, it may be a little large range
meh, let's see what happens
2.6 is too high. Full value of both hats? Yeah right...
You need to account for unusual overpay for both hats. Taking the range for both hats does not work.
1.3 + 17/22 = 2.1 buds, there's your price, and a flat rate is probably fine for this hat.
We cant say its an overpay when you dont know the price for the unpriced hat. I think ranged its still better for now
It's not a matter of the hat being unpriced. The fact is, the way unusuals are priced here is that whenever you pay in unusuals for another unusual, overpay MUST be accounted for, without exception. This is to account for the fact that the prices we submit are in pure buds, whereas it is not always an easy task to convert a payment of unusuals to their middle or higher bp.tf value in buds.
I'm not trying to be hard on you, but this will be an easy reject for the mods, simply because the pricing method used is incorrect.
Its ok, i like every single opinion :).
Anyway, despite im not using the regular pricing method, i think its still pretty fair, and other methods that are not looking for a flat price, are very similar on results
The regular pricing method applies to ALL unusuals. I JUST went over this with another guy who thought he knew better than everyone else:
http://backpack.tf/vote/id/51ed391c4bd7b82515000016
http://backpack.tf/vote/id/51ee3b17ba2536a810000007
Also, there are other sales, you need to find out what it has sold for before (or after) and include that in your range, taking care to not include extreme quicksells or overpays