Price Suggestion
Vintage Foster's Facade
Submitted by Roller
~22.16 ref
Vintage Foster's Facade
165 votes up
43 votes down
Advertisement
Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted by Elsa Payaso.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

    I commented on your other trade, I've found the same thing here. You've got next to no proof, you've actually shown 2 trades within the current range being sold, and you've shown trades of quicksellers that have sold within the day. I don't know whether you just don't understand this isn't sufficient proof or not, but the fact remains this proof doesn't prove your point. Equal downvote

      I don't see how this isn't valid. Roller has successfully shown both unsolds and solds (judging from the labels) below 1.33 refined, and these trades are in a higher quantity than 1.33. Surely these should be factored in the range?

        Alright, time for the "polite" response. He has not shown unsolds, seeing as all of his links are less than a week old. He has not provided substantial proof by any means. 4 links at 1.33, the current range might I add, of those 2 have been sold, 2 were made less than a day ago. He hasn't provided proof that should or will be factored by me, proof needs to be at least 1 week old in the unsolds section, otherwise it's too early to tell. The sold section has again, links under 1 week, many of which sold for 2 scrap less immediately, so it isn't valid, dozens of quickbuyers and impatient sellers, isn't much new about that, the reality is he didn't do a good job at proving he was right, and he needs to be told that to better himself in the future if he continues to help impact the community.

          Why do I need to provide unsolds? It's not a valid proof after all.

            What're you talking about? Unsolds are essential in the argument you're making, if they're no unsolds at 1.33, why even make this suggestion?

              1.33 is in range ._. There's no point to provide unsolds for 1.33

                ??? Did you just entirely miss what I said....yes it has a range that includes 1.33, but if they're being sold for 1.33 and the only proof of lower you've provided is quicksells that were bought within a very short period of time, that isn't a reason to make 1-1.33 necessary

      Honestly this discussion seems to be going in circles, I've got no time to explain the fundamentals of making a "good" suggestion to someone who is experienced as yourself, I'm going to downvote, others should do the same

      Rather hard to sell, i sold mine for 1.11 so maybe that would be a better price range. upvote for me this time