Suggestion: Strange Gunslinger at 25–26 keys

Price Suggestion

~177 keys

166 votes up

160 votes down

Related Suggestions

This suggestion was accepted Sun, 11 Aug 13 06:44:37 +0000 by SirJjjon.

Comments can no longer be left on this suggestion.

Comments

Selling for 27 keys

--------------------------

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/13155867 < offered 27 keys

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/13056755 < offered bud + 4 keys(so 25.5 offer)

Seller for 26 keys

------------------------

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/13424986 < still new, got a bot killer set offer

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/13428946 < still new

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/13424906 < 1 day old

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/13146872 < not sold yet

Sold for 26 keys

--------------------------

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/13449107

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/13272493

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/13278526 (has parts though)

http://tf2tp.com/trade.php?trade=9688361

Quickbuys for 25 keys

-------------

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12622649

Horrible Proof From the accepted trade!!!

The last trade showed a bunch of quicksellers

http://backpack.tf/vote/id/520225b34bd7b8b57200001b

^ Two of the links of 25 key sellers are from the same guy.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/12460853 25 < This trade was a month old..why was this used as proof?

All the links that posted less then 25 sold super fast, and there was barely any old sold 26 key old proof.

Admins, why did you accept it with such horrible proof?

Why was the last suggestion passed?

And you have... two links?

so the last one had a couple of 26 key unsolds and yet that passed..already counter proofed the last suggestion with those few.

Please look here: http://forums.backpack.tf/index.php?/topic/75-guidelines-for-suggestion-question-threads/

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/13155867 < offered 27 keys - Has S. Part dominations and is irrelevant proof.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/13056755 < offered bud + 4 keys(so 25.5 offer) - Was almost 1 week ago and he obviously didn't sell for 27.

Sold for 26 keys

--------------------------

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/13449107 - ok

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/13272493 - He didn't actually sell

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/13278526(has parts though) - As you said, has parts and is irrelevant.

Bad proof.

Second guy did sell(look at his backpack), he sold it to a non-outpost user so it will not show up in the trade history.

I aplogise. You have 2 proofs. Still not nearly enough.

ignored the tf2tp as proof? (this makes 3)

also on my trade I got an offer that totals 27 - 29 keys

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/13449107#p42774467

(and if this counts, it makes 4)

There's no proof that the tf2tp one actually sold.

Also for your offer of 27 - 29 keys after factoring in overpay it's 24.3 - 26.1 if taken in the middle it's 25.2 which is just a tiny bit above the current range. Definitely not 26.

Not sure what this counts as but I got offered a

S.F. Flamethrower(13) + Unusual Armored Authority(14 - 16 keys) = 27 - 29 keys

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/13449107#p42774467

Not enough proof, even if you disagreed with the last suggestion, handle it the proper way.

http://www.tf2outpost.com/trade/13426457 < buying S. Gunslinger for 25 keys+ in value

http://imgur.com/vrWnPPR

http://www.tf2outpost.com/backpack/76561198006798991

http://www.tf2outpost.com/item/440,1865016995,142,11

I sold another strange gunslinger for 26 keys..So that's 2 sold for me within 3 days. Anyone selling for less is very impatient.

Inb4 price manipulation

http://backpack.tf/vote/id/520225b34bd7b8b57200001b < yep, looks like manipulation to me

No, the last suggestion shouldn't of ever passed with such horrible proof

Quickbuyers don't matter, for one.

Second, I don't think you have the right to complain about the last suggestion passing with bad proof when you provide even less valid proof than he did.

how did the last one get through o_O